Relationship between various working drafts

[aisaac]

Following #15 I've added a link to https://github.com/IIIF/discovery/blob/master/source/api/harvest/0.1/index.md from our README page. But with the creation of http://preview.iiif.io/api/discovery/api/discovery/0.1/. I'm wondering how we should work now: how are comments on the one supposed to make it through to another? Should we "kill" our current working draft and comment only on the gihub repo that preview.iiif.io is based on?

I'm assigning this to @azaroth42 as he's clearly the editor leading the work on Crawling/Harvesting, but I'm curious to hear opinions from other editors (@jpstroop @zimeon @tomcrane @mikeapp) as well as @mattmcgrattan and @glenrobson

[azaroth42]

Given that the TSG feels that the work is ready to take to the community for further feedback, I think we point to the 0.1 spec from the discovery doc, once it has been merged to master and thus publicly available.

The circulation of preview links for comment has been problematic in the past, with changing references and so forth. They're extremely useful for internal discussion rather than reading markdown documents, but IMO that's the extent of their purpose.

[azaroth42]

Updated README and harvest spec to put pointers to the preview of discovery.