Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

WG10: Interoperability with IFC for Rail, Roads, Bridges, Buildings, etc. #133

Open
isotc211 opened this issue Mar 16, 2021 · 14 comments
Open

WG10: Interoperability with IFC for Rail, Roads, Bridges, Buildings, etc. #133

isotc211 opened this issue Mar 16, 2021 · 14 comments
Assignees
@isotc211
Labels
New Requirement A requirement is a request for an organization to add or support something that they do not already technical A specific technical issue identified within a published standard/document. WG10 ISO/TC 211 WG10, Ubiquitous public access

Comments

@isotc211
Copy link
Collaborator

isotc211 commented Mar 16, 2021 •
edited
Loading

Justification: BIM is rapidly going into infrastructure area. IFC for Rail, Roads, Bridges etc. has geospatial component in it. We need to look into interoperability issues in terms of GIS-BIM integration.
Proposal: New request
@isotc211 isotc211 self-assigned this Mar 16, 2021
@isotc211 isotc211 changed the title Issue #113 WG10: Interoperability with IFC for Rail, Roads, Bridges, Buildings, etc. Mar 16, 2021
@isotc211 isotc211 added technical A specific technical issue identified within a published standard/document. WG10 ISO/TC 211 WG10, Ubiquitous public access labels Mar 16, 2021
@isotc211
Copy link
Collaborator Author

WG 10 is investigating possible work related to geographic information aspects in IFC.
Any standards development could be done in WG 10 of ISO/TC 211 or in ISO/TC 59/SC 13/JWG 14 Joint ISO/TC 59/SC 13 - ISO/TC 211 WG: GIS-BIM interoperability.

12 similar comments
@isotc211
Copy link
Collaborator Author

WG 10 is investigating possible work related to geographic information aspects in IFC.
Any standards development could be done in WG 10 of ISO/TC 211 or in ISO/TC 59/SC 13/JWG 14 Joint ISO/TC 59/SC 13 - ISO/TC 211 WG: GIS-BIM interoperability.

@isotc211
Copy link
Collaborator Author

WG 10 is investigating possible work related to geographic information aspects in IFC.
Any standards development could be done in WG 10 of ISO/TC 211 or in ISO/TC 59/SC 13/JWG 14 Joint ISO/TC 59/SC 13 - ISO/TC 211 WG: GIS-BIM interoperability.

@isotc211
Copy link
Collaborator Author

WG 10 is investigating possible work related to geographic information aspects in IFC.
Any standards development could be done in WG 10 of ISO/TC 211 or in ISO/TC 59/SC 13/JWG 14 Joint ISO/TC 59/SC 13 - ISO/TC 211 WG: GIS-BIM interoperability.

@isotc211
Copy link
Collaborator Author

WG 10 is investigating possible work related to geographic information aspects in IFC.
Any standards development could be done in WG 10 of ISO/TC 211 or in ISO/TC 59/SC 13/JWG 14 Joint ISO/TC 59/SC 13 - ISO/TC 211 WG: GIS-BIM interoperability.

@isotc211
Copy link
Collaborator Author

WG 10 is investigating possible work related to geographic information aspects in IFC.
Any standards development could be done in WG 10 of ISO/TC 211 or in ISO/TC 59/SC 13/JWG 14 Joint ISO/TC 59/SC 13 - ISO/TC 211 WG: GIS-BIM interoperability.

@isotc211
Copy link
Collaborator Author

WG 10 is investigating possible work related to geographic information aspects in IFC.
Any standards development could be done in WG 10 of ISO/TC 211 or in ISO/TC 59/SC 13/JWG 14 Joint ISO/TC 59/SC 13 - ISO/TC 211 WG: GIS-BIM interoperability.

@isotc211
Copy link
Collaborator Author

WG 10 is investigating possible work related to geographic information aspects in IFC.
Any standards development could be done in WG 10 of ISO/TC 211 or in ISO/TC 59/SC 13/JWG 14 Joint ISO/TC 59/SC 13 - ISO/TC 211 WG: GIS-BIM interoperability.

@isotc211
Copy link
Collaborator Author

WG 10 is investigating possible work related to geographic information aspects in IFC.
Any standards development could be done in WG 10 of ISO/TC 211 or in ISO/TC 59/SC 13/JWG 14 Joint ISO/TC 59/SC 13 - ISO/TC 211 WG: GIS-BIM interoperability.

@isotc211
Copy link
Collaborator Author

WG 10 is investigating possible work related to geographic information aspects in IFC.
Any standards development could be done in WG 10 of ISO/TC 211 or in ISO/TC 59/SC 13/JWG 14 Joint ISO/TC 59/SC 13 - ISO/TC 211 WG: GIS-BIM interoperability.

@isotc211
Copy link
Collaborator Author

WG 10 is investigating possible work related to geographic information aspects in IFC.
Any standards development could be done in WG 10 of ISO/TC 211 or in ISO/TC 59/SC 13/JWG 14 Joint ISO/TC 59/SC 13 - ISO/TC 211 WG: GIS-BIM interoperability.

@isotc211
Copy link
Collaborator Author

WG 10 is investigating possible work related to geographic information aspects in IFC.
Any standards development could be done in WG 10 of ISO/TC 211 or in ISO/TC 59/SC 13/JWG 14 Joint ISO/TC 59/SC 13 - ISO/TC 211 WG: GIS-BIM interoperability.

@isotc211
Copy link
Collaborator Author

WG 10 is investigating possible work related to geographic information aspects in IFC.
Any standards development could be done in WG 10 of ISO/TC 211 or in ISO/TC 59/SC 13/JWG 14 Joint ISO/TC 59/SC 13 - ISO/TC 211 WG: GIS-BIM interoperability.

@isotc211 isotc211 added the New Requirement A requirement is a request for an organization to add or support something that they do not already label Mar 17, 2021
@PeterParslow
Copy link
Contributor

See also #155

@PeterParslow PeterParslow mentioned this issue May 25, 2021
Open
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees

@isotc211 isotc211

Labels
New Requirement A requirement is a request for an organization to add or support something that they do not already technical A specific technical issue identified within a published standard/document. WG10 ISO/TC 211 WG10, Ubiquitous public access
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@PeterParslow @isotc211