Assert Required Claims Flexibility

[Lutando]

Some context of my issue over here. The short of it, is that it seems I cannot SignIn() a user if the principal does not contain the name claim even if the principal has been specified to use a different claim type as the name claim.

In my case I would like to use the "preferred_username" as the principals name. I am pretty sure that the claims principal has the claim type of where the name came from as well, so this wouldn't be too much of a fuss to do. Could something like checking for the name claim type rather than just doing a blanket check on the claim type "name" like it is now? The LOC in question is here

Thanks.

[leastprivilege]

We simply use a claim called name for the UI. Simply create a name claim with whatever content you want.

[Lutando]

OK. I guess all is good then. Thanks a lot.

[lock]

This thread has been automatically locked since there has not been any recent activity after it was closed. Please open a new issue for related bugs.