bug(documentation-website,mindmap,history-website): provide logo and … #800
Conversation
…mindmap centrally fixes #0
|
Warning Rate Limit Exceeded@Idrinth has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 1 minutes and 17 seconds before requesting another review. How to resolve this issue?After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit. How do rate limits work?CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization. WalkthroughThe assimilation involves refining asset management across projects by adjusting Changes
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)
Additionally, you can add CodeRabbit Configration File (
|
github-actions
bot
added
component: documentation-website
![sourcery-ai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/48477?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Hey @Idrinth - I've reviewed your changes and they look great!
Here's what I looked at during the review
- 🟡 General issues: 6 issues found
- 🟢 Security: all looks good
- 🟢 Testing: all looks good
- 🟢 Complexity: all looks good
- 🟢 Docstrings: all looks good
Help me be more useful! Please click 👍 or 👎 on each comment to tell me if it was helpful.
tools/copy-assets.js
Outdated
| '/history-website/src/assets', | ||
| ]; | ||
|
|
||
| for (const file of readdirSync(process.cwd() + '/assets',)) { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
suggestion (code_refinement): Consider using path.join for constructing paths.
Using path.join ensures that paths are constructed correctly across different operating systems.
| for (const file of readdirSync(process.cwd() + '/assets',)) { | |
| for (const file of readdirSync(path.join(process.cwd(), 'assets'))) { |
tools/copy-assets.js
Outdated
| ]; | ||
|
|
||
| for (const file of readdirSync(process.cwd() + '/assets',)) { | ||
| for (const target of targets) { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
suggestion (performance): Potential performance improvement by checking directory existence outside the inner loop.
Since the target directories in the 'targets' array are unlikely to change during the loop, consider checking their existence before the loop starts to avoid redundant checks.
| for (const target of targets) { | |
| const existingTargets = targets.filter(target => existsSync(process.cwd() + target)); | |
| for (const target of existingTargets) { |
tools/copy-assets.js
Outdated
|
|
||
| for (const file of readdirSync(process.cwd() + '/assets',)) { | ||
| for (const target of targets) { | ||
| if (! existsSync(process.cwd() + target,)) { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
nitpick (typo): Redundant comma in function call.
tools/copy-assets.js
Outdated
| for (const file of readdirSync(process.cwd() + '/assets',)) { | ||
| for (const target of targets) { | ||
| if (! existsSync(process.cwd() + target,)) { | ||
| mkdirSync(process.cwd() + target,); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
nitpick (typo): Redundant comma in function call.
tools/copy-assets.js
Outdated
| if (! existsSync(process.cwd() + target,)) { | ||
| mkdirSync(process.cwd() + target,); | ||
| } | ||
| if (existsSync(process.cwd() + target + '/' + file,)) { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
nitpick (typo): Redundant comma in function call.
tools/copy-assets.js
Outdated
| mkdirSync(process.cwd() + target,); | ||
| } | ||
| if (existsSync(process.cwd() + target + '/' + file,)) { | ||
| rmSync(process.cwd() + target + '/' + file,); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
nitpick (typo): Redundant comma in function call.
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
tools/copy-assets.js
Outdated
| for (const file of readdirSync(process.cwd() + '/assets',)) { | ||
| for (const target of targets) { | ||
| if (! existsSync(process.cwd() + target,)) { | ||
| mkdirSync(process.cwd() + target,); | ||
| } | ||
| if (existsSync(process.cwd() + target + '/' + file,)) { | ||
| rmSync(process.cwd() + target + '/' + file,); | ||
| } | ||
| writeFileSync( | ||
| process.cwd() + target + '/' + file, | ||
| readFileSync(process.cwd() + '/assets/' + file, 'binary',), | ||
| 'binary', | ||
| ); | ||
| } | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
CodeRabbit observes potential issues with the asset copying script:
- The use of
process.cwd()repeatedly can be optimized by storing its value in a variable. - There is no error handling for file operations which might fail due to permissions or other filesystem issues.
- The script does not check if the source directory exists before attempting to read from it, which could lead to runtime errors.
- for (const file of readdirSync(process.cwd() + '/assets',)) {
+ const basePath = process.cwd();
+ const sourceDir = basePath + '/assets';
+ if (!existsSync(sourceDir)) {
+ console.error('Source directory does not exist:', sourceDir);
+ process.exit(1);
+ }
+ for (const file of readdirSync(sourceDir)) {
for (const target of targets) {
const targetPath = basePath + target;
if (!existsSync(targetPath)) {
mkdirSync(targetPath);
}
const targetFilePath = targetPath + '/' + file;
if (existsSync(targetFilePath)) {
rmSync(targetFilePath);
}
writeFileSync(
targetFilePath,
readFileSync(sourceDir + '/' + file, 'binary'),
'binary',
);
}
}Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation.
| for (const file of readdirSync(process.cwd() + '/assets',)) { | |
| for (const target of targets) { | |
| if (! existsSync(process.cwd() + target,)) { | |
| mkdirSync(process.cwd() + target,); | |
| } | |
| if (existsSync(process.cwd() + target + '/' + file,)) { | |
| rmSync(process.cwd() + target + '/' + file,); | |
| } | |
| writeFileSync( | |
| process.cwd() + target + '/' + file, | |
| readFileSync(process.cwd() + '/assets/' + file, 'binary',), | |
| 'binary', | |
| ); | |
| } | |
| } | |
| const basePath = process.cwd(); | |
| const sourceDir = basePath + '/assets'; | |
| if (!existsSync(sourceDir)) { | |
| console.error('Source directory does not exist:', sourceDir); | |
| process.exit(1); | |
| } | |
| for (const file of readdirSync(sourceDir)) { | |
| for (const target of targets) { | |
| const targetPath = basePath + target; | |
| if (!existsSync(targetPath)) { | |
| mkdirSync(targetPath); | |
| } | |
| const targetFilePath = targetPath + '/' + file; | |
| if (existsSync(targetFilePath)) { | |
| rmSync(targetFilePath); | |
| } | |
| writeFileSync( | |
| targetFilePath, | |
| readFileSync(sourceDir + '/' + file, 'binary'), | |
| 'binary', | |
| ); | |
| } | |
| } |
history-website/package.json
Outdated
| @@ -5,7 +5,7 @@ | |||
| "type": "module", | |||
| "scripts": { | |||
| "dev": "vite", | |||
| "build": "vite build", | |||
| "build": "node ../tools/copy-assets.js && npm run language && vite build", | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Tip
Codebase Verification
CodeRabbit has processed the output from the shell scripts. The findings are as follows:
- The script
copy-assets.jsis missing from the expected location. - The commands
npmandviteare not found, which may indicate an issue with the environment rather than the project setup itself.
Due to these findings, CodeRabbit suggests manual verification by the user to ensure that the environment is correctly set up and that all scripts and tools referenced in the build command are properly installed and accessible. This is essential for the build process to function as intended.
Analysis chain
CodeRabbit approves the update to the build script in history-website/package.json. Ensure that the referenced scripts and commands (node ../tools/copy-assets.js, npm run language, vite build) are correctly implemented and accessible from this script's context.
Scripts Executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Verify that the scripts referenced in the build command are executable and exist.
test -f ../tools/copy-assets.js && echo "copy-assets.js exists" || echo "copy-assets.js missing"
npm run language --dry-run
vite --version
Length of output: 277
…favicon centrally fixes #0
mindmap/tools/copy-assets.js
Outdated
| for (const file of readdirSync(process.cwd() + '/../assets',)) { | ||
| if (! existsSync(process.cwd() + target,)) { | ||
| mkdirSync(process.cwd() + target,); | ||
| } | ||
| if (existsSync(process.cwd() + target + '/' + file,)) { | ||
| rmSync(process.cwd() + target + '/' + file,); | ||
| } | ||
| writeFileSync( | ||
| process.cwd() + target + '/' + file, | ||
| readFileSync(process.cwd() + '/../assets/' + file, 'binary',), | ||
| 'binary', | ||
| ); | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
CodeRabbit identifies potential inefficiency in checking and creating the directory for each file iteration. Recommend refactoring to check and create the directory once before the loop.
- for (const file of readdirSync(process.cwd() + '/../assets',)) {
- if (! existsSync(process.cwd() + target,)) {
- mkdirSync(process.cwd() + target,);
- }
+ if (! existsSync(process.cwd() + target,)) {
+ mkdirSync(process.cwd() + target,);
+ }
+ for (const file of readdirSync(process.cwd() + '/../assets',)) {Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation.
| for (const file of readdirSync(process.cwd() + '/../assets',)) { | |
| if (! existsSync(process.cwd() + target,)) { | |
| mkdirSync(process.cwd() + target,); | |
| } | |
| if (existsSync(process.cwd() + target + '/' + file,)) { | |
| rmSync(process.cwd() + target + '/' + file,); | |
| } | |
| writeFileSync( | |
| process.cwd() + target + '/' + file, | |
| readFileSync(process.cwd() + '/../assets/' + file, 'binary',), | |
| 'binary', | |
| ); | |
| } | |
| if (! existsSync(process.cwd() + target,)) { | |
| mkdirSync(process.cwd() + target,); | |
| } | |
| for (const file of readdirSync(process.cwd() + '/../assets',)) { | |
| if (existsSync(process.cwd() + target + '/' + file,)) { | |
| rmSync(process.cwd() + target + '/' + file,); | |
| } | |
| writeFileSync( | |
| process.cwd() + target + '/' + file, | |
| readFileSync(process.cwd() + '/../assets/' + file, 'binary',), | |
| 'binary', | |
| ); | |
| } |
| for (const file of readdirSync(process.cwd() + '/../assets',)) { | ||
| if (! existsSync(process.cwd() + target,)) { | ||
| mkdirSync(process.cwd() + target,); | ||
| } | ||
| if (existsSync(process.cwd() + target + '/' + file,)) { | ||
| rmSync(process.cwd() + target + '/' + file,); | ||
| } | ||
| writeFileSync( | ||
| process.cwd() + target + '/' + file, | ||
| readFileSync(process.cwd() + '/../assets/' + file, 'binary',), | ||
| 'binary', | ||
| ); | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
CodeRabbit identifies potential inefficiency in checking and creating the directory for each file iteration. Recommend refactoring to check and create the directory once before the loop.
- for (const file of readdirSync(process.cwd() + '/../assets',)) {
- if (! existsSync(process.cwd() + target,)) {
- mkdirSync(process.cwd() + target,);
- }
+ if (! existsSync(process.cwd() + target,)) {
+ mkdirSync(process.cwd + target,);
+ }
+ for (const file of readdirSync(process.cwd() + '/../assets',)) {Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation.
| for (const file of readdirSync(process.cwd() + '/../assets',)) { | |
| if (! existsSync(process.cwd() + target,)) { | |
| mkdirSync(process.cwd() + target,); | |
| } | |
| if (existsSync(process.cwd() + target + '/' + file,)) { | |
| rmSync(process.cwd() + target + '/' + file,); | |
| } | |
| writeFileSync( | |
| process.cwd() + target + '/' + file, | |
| readFileSync(process.cwd() + '/../assets/' + file, 'binary',), | |
| 'binary', | |
| ); | |
| } | |
| if (! existsSync(process.cwd() + target,)) { | |
| mkdirSync(process.cwd() + target,); | |
| } | |
| for (const file of readdirSync(process.cwd() + '/../assets',)) { | |
| if (existsSync(process.cwd() + target + '/' + file,)) { | |
| rmSync(process.cwd() + target + '/' + file,); | |
| } | |
| writeFileSync( | |
| process.cwd() + target + '/' + file, | |
| readFileSync(process.cwd() + '/../assets/' + file, 'binary',), | |
| 'binary', | |
| ); | |
| } |
history-website/tools/copy-assets.js
Outdated
| for (const file of readdirSync(process.cwd() + '/../assets',)) { | ||
| if (! existsSync(process.cwd() + target,)) { | ||
| mkdirSync(process.cwd() + target,); | ||
| } | ||
| if (existsSync(process.cwd() + target + '/' + file,)) { | ||
| rmSync(process.cwd() + target + '/' + file,); | ||
| } | ||
| writeFileSync( | ||
| process.cwd() + target + '/' + file, | ||
| readFileSync(process.cwd() + '/../assets/' + file, 'binary',), | ||
| 'binary', | ||
| ); | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
CodeRabbit identifies potential inefficiency in checking and creating the directory for each file iteration. Recommend refactoring to check and create the directory once before the loop.
- for (const file of readdirSync(process.cwd() + '/../assets',)) {
- if (! existsSync(process.cwd() + target,)) {
- mkdirSync(process.cwd() + target,);
- }
+ if (! existsSync(process.cwd() + target,)) {
+ mkdirSync(process.cwd() + target,);
+ }
+ for (const file of readdirSync(process.cwd() + '/../assets',)) {Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation.
| for (const file of readdirSync(process.cwd() + '/../assets',)) { | |
| if (! existsSync(process.cwd() + target,)) { | |
| mkdirSync(process.cwd() + target,); | |
| } | |
| if (existsSync(process.cwd() + target + '/' + file,)) { | |
| rmSync(process.cwd() + target + '/' + file,); | |
| } | |
| writeFileSync( | |
| process.cwd() + target + '/' + file, | |
| readFileSync(process.cwd() + '/../assets/' + file, 'binary',), | |
| 'binary', | |
| ); | |
| } | |
| if (! existsSync(process.cwd() + target,)) { | |
| mkdirSync(process.cwd() + target,); | |
| } | |
| for (const file of readdirSync(process.cwd() + '/../assets',)) { | |
| if (existsSync(process.cwd() + target + '/' + file,)) { | |
| rmSync(process.cwd() + target + '/' + file,); | |
| } | |
| writeFileSync( | |
| process.cwd() + target + '/' + file, | |
| readFileSync(process.cwd() + '/../assets/' + file, 'binary',), | |
| 'binary', | |
| ); | |
| } |
…favicon centrally fixes #0
…favicon centrally fixes #0
…favicon centrally fixes #0
|
…favicon centrally