-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 83
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Debian side regression #130
Comments
gscan2pdf had a network issue, presumably unrelated to ImageMagick. imagick has one issue with the 50% interval returning 32767 when it should return 32828. See f38ca0d. Please verify. We will release 6.9.11-58 today that includes the patch. If you have additional problems, let us know and we'll fix within a day or two. |
Hi,
Cristy could you geta glimpse at
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=980202
It seems this is our breakage
Bastien
Le sam. 16 janv. 2021 à 18:15, Cristy <notifications@github.com> a écrit :
…
gscan2pdf had a network issue, presumably unrelated to ImageMagick. imagick has one issue with the 50% interval returning 32767 when it should return 32828. See f38ca0d. Please verify. We will release 6.9.11-58 today that includes the patch.
If you have additional problems, let us know and we'll fix within a day or two.
—
You are receiving this because you authored the thread.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or unsubscribe.
|
Working on it. Give us a few days and we will post here when we make some progress. |
I have uploaded 8.9.11.58 under debian unstable.
THis have fixed the i386 regression on php but not the gscan2pdf problem....
Le ven. 22 janv. 2021 à 18:58, Cristy <notifications@github.com> a écrit :
…
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=980202 claims
convert +matte -depth 1 -colorspace Gray -pointsize 12 -units PixelsPerInch -density 300 label:"The quick brown fox" test.png
returns unexpected results. We tried the command with ImageMagick 6.9.11-58 and get expected results under Fedora 33 and Debian 4.19.160-2 I686. Can you try -58 on our system. Do you get expected results (test-old.png from bug report)? If not, tell us how to reproduce the problem.
—
You are receiving this because you authored the thread.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or unsubscribe.
|
Thanks for the problem report. We can reproduce it and will have a patch to fix it in the GIT main branch @ https://github.com/ImageMagick/ImageMagick6 later today. The patch will be available in the beta releases of ImageMagick @ https://imagemagick.org/download/beta/ by sometime tomorrow. The problem was a performance optimization that broke text rendering. We reverted the patch. The official -59 release will be available within a few days. |
Hi,
Unofrtunatly it seems not fixed on the gscan2pdf side
Bastien
Le sam. 23 janv. 2021 à 16:50, Cristy <notifications@github.com> a écrit :
…
Thanks for the problem report. We can reproduce it and will have a patch to fix it in the GIT master branch @ https://github.com/ImageMagick/ImageMagick later today. The patch will be available in the beta releases of ImageMagick @ https://www.imagemagick.org/download/beta/ by sometime tomorrow.
The problem was a performance optimization that broke text rendering. We reverted the patch. The official -58 release will be available within a few days.
—
You are receiving this because you authored the thread.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or unsubscribe.
|
Just send you a mail but it seems that we have a regression on the debian side between .46 and .57
See https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/imagemagick
Ignore ruby-magick that is already broken.
Do you have an idea?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: