Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Daemonization of Modbus/TCP connection manager #18

Closed
iomz opened this issue Aug 6, 2021 · 2 comments · Fixed by #32
Closed

Daemonization of Modbus/TCP connection manager #18

iomz opened this issue Aug 6, 2021 · 2 comments · Fixed by #32
Assignees
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@iomz
Copy link
Contributor

iomz commented Aug 6, 2021

Once we find a way to daemonize the xArm connection handler, we will implement server command to start establishing the connection with an xArm robot.

@iomz iomz added the enhancement New feature or request label Aug 6, 2021
@iomz iomz assigned iomz and jo-bru Aug 6, 2021
@iomz iomz unassigned jo-bru Oct 5, 2021
@iomz iomz changed the title Implement server command Demonization of Mosbus/TCP connection manager Oct 5, 2021
@iomz iomz changed the title Demonization of Mosbus/TCP connection manager Demonization of Modbus/TCP connection manager Oct 5, 2021
@iomz
Copy link
Contributor Author

iomz commented Oct 5, 2021

I will try to finish this by the end of this week (contrary to my plan to do it last weekend).

@iomz
Copy link
Contributor Author

iomz commented Oct 10, 2021

After refreshing my C++ knowledge, the idea is not that easy with any IPC solution. Over the course I also discovered the raw Modbus socket (the UxbusCmdSer class) is already implemented and can be used with is_tcp_ = false – this makes the planned raw Modbus latency evaluation on the control box easier.

Any, I'll attempt to achieve this with gRPC instead – once and for all this will be my first complete gRPC project.

@iomz iomz changed the title Demonization of Modbus/TCP connection manager Daemonization of Modbus/TCP connection manager Oct 10, 2021
@iomz iomz closed this as completed in #32 Oct 19, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

2 participants