As a user I want to know reviewers are being assigned fairly

[James-Firth]

There's a few things I could think of to help with this:

• Stat tracking
  • Keep track of who is assigned to PRs so we have absolute numbers on who gets assigned (and who actually reviews)
  • Maybe with a command to view it?
• Weighted randomness
  • Make it so everyone starts evenly, then people who review less are weighted more heavily

[kylebrownnc]

if you want to get super fancy you can possibly review number of lines changed as well instead of raw PR counts? also if they;e already approved a PR don;t count it since they're finished with that PR

[James-Firth]

Oh yeah that might be a good idea!

Also wonder if multiple reviews on the same PR should count as multiple or one review for the purposes of weighting. Thoughts?

I think step 1 would be tracking a bunch of data from the reviews then.
I'll see how much data I can get from the webhook (or I can always query for more data).

Data I'd like:

• Repo owner
• Repo name
• Reviewer id
• PR number
• Review Number
• PR Number of lines added
• PR Number of lines removed
• PR Total lines changed (might just calculate this)
• Timestamp

Then it'd be easy to weight based on a variety of factors depending on what works best.