Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Working Groups: Add social links beneath each worker #4593

Open
mochet opened this issue Oct 25, 2023 · 4 comments
Open

Working Groups: Add social links beneath each worker #4593

mochet opened this issue Oct 25, 2023 · 4 comments
Labels
community-dev issue suitable for community-dev pipeline enhancement New feature or request high-prio scope:members The "Members" page and related features scope:working-groups The "Working Groups" page and related featrues

Comments

@mochet
Copy link
Collaborator

mochet commented Oct 25, 2023

Problem

When new random users visit Pioneer they will want to ascertain legitimacy and its import for this to be doable in an easy way. Commonly on "team" pages on web3 projects you will find social links (i.e. Twitter, GitHub etc) beneath workers.

For some WGs like Storage and Distribution it is probable (and already the case) that we will have quite upstanding and well known web3 companies acting as infrastructure providers and it increases the value prospect of the project if this information is better made visible via social profiles.

See below example of the builders WG:
image

A small set of buttons should be under each profile, something like this. It doesn't need to be huge and could fit tidily under the worker profiles.
image

@mochet mochet added the enhancement New feature or request label Oct 25, 2023
@dmtrjsg
Copy link
Contributor

dmtrjsg commented Oct 27, 2023

Smth like this could be used:
Screenshot 2023-10-27 at 14 16 00

@dmtrjsg dmtrjsg added the community-dev issue suitable for community-dev pipeline label Oct 27, 2023
@msmadeline
Copy link

@chrlschwb @dmtrjsg @mochet Hello! I created 4 version of displaying the socials on the worker profile's so that we can choose the best solution.

IMO version 1 and version 4 are the best one's just because they are easy to read and very clear to understand. They also look the best for me when it comes to the layout. Version 4 is suitable for every worker handle lenght as well so nothing will clash with each other.

Version 2 has a layout that is a little bit confusing and it just doesn't look good imo.

Figma file ➡https://www.figma.com/file/NVVEvdbacBlL0VIfMEwd8j/Working-Groups?type=design&node-id=4-3830&mode=design&t=CC8lPjZHuYy0uaHj-4

image

@dmtrjsg
Copy link
Contributor

dmtrjsg commented Nov 22, 2023

I'd say v3 but swap worker badges with SM badges so roles come first.

@msmadeline
Copy link

@traumschule traumschule added scope:working-groups The "Working Groups" page and related featrues scope:members The "Members" page and related features labels Dec 23, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
community-dev issue suitable for community-dev pipeline enhancement New feature or request high-prio scope:members The "Members" page and related features scope:working-groups The "Working Groups" page and related featrues
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

5 participants