Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

only test missing values if type has Missing #1367

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Mar 2, 2018

Conversation

Ken-B
Copy link
Contributor

@Ken-B Ken-B commented Feb 28, 2018

Fixes #1358 until JuliaLang/julia#21256 is fixed.

The issue with enumerate somehow allocating during the loop seems fixed on Julia master (0.7/1.0).

Since this is a performance change, I don't quite know if and how to add a test. Suggestions?

Fixes JuliaData#1358 until JuliaLang/julia#21256 is fixed.

The issue with `enumerate` somehow allocating during the loop seems fixed on Julia master (0.7/1.0).

Since this is a performance change, I don't quite know if and how to add a test. Suggestions?
Copy link
Member

@nalimilan nalimilan left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks. We could check that performance doesn't regress by adding benchmarks using PkgBenchmarks, but currently the infrastructure isn't set up so let's just merge without (new) tests.

@nalimilan nalimilan merged commit 9459d08 into JuliaData:master Mar 2, 2018
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

completecases for dataframe without allowing for missing could be no-op
2 participants