Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update Aqua to workaround ambiguity detection in Julia 1.6.0-DEV.816 #197

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Sep 6, 2020

Conversation

tkf
Copy link
Member

@tkf tkf commented Sep 6, 2020

Commit Message

Update Aqua to workaround ambiguity detection in Julia 1.6.0-DEV.816 (#197)

See also: JuliaTesting/Aqua.jl#32

Using commit:
Ignore ambiguities from Base for now
JuliaTesting/Aqua.jl@0df9f96
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Sep 6, 2020

Codecov Report

Merging #197 into master will not change coverage.
The diff coverage is n/a.

Impacted file tree graph

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master     #197   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   91.53%   91.53%           
=======================================
  Files          22       22           
  Lines         496      496           
=======================================
  Hits          454      454           
  Misses         42       42           

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 17decd2...d830ba3. Read the comment docs.

Using commit:
Workaround over-sensitive ambiguity detection from JuliaLang/julia#36962 (#32)
JuliaTesting/Aqua.jl@fe03e3f
@tkf tkf changed the title Update: Aqua Update Aqua to workaround ambiguity detection in Julia 1.6.0-DEV.816 Sep 6, 2020
@mergify mergify bot merged commit ac5f516 into master Sep 6, 2020
@mergify mergify bot deleted the update-aqua branch September 6, 2020 22:26
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

1 participant