-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 37
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Is the code consistent with the description in the paper? #5
Comments
Hi, @AlphaPlusTT Actually there are no difference and the code is consistent with the paper. The logit for the i-th class can be expressed by Eq. (7) and Eq. (8) in the paper (in which ''x_k \cdot m_i'' can be replaced by s_k^i ), so the form of the second term of Eq. (8) is equal to the line 26 at "pipeline/csra.py''. Best, |
Thanks for your reply. I try to use your method for pedestrian attribute recognition task with dataset rapv2, but the CSRA dose not work. Do you have any suggestions? |
@AlphaPlusTT i am also trying the same on PETA dataset and facing error , what error are you facing ? @Kevinz-code pls do share ur thoughts |
@abhigoku10 @AlphaPlusTT
Best, |
According to formula 5 and formula 6 in the paper, the class-specific residual attention (CSRA) feature f should be sent to
the classifier to obtain the final logits, but in your code, you use the f as the final logits, what's the difference?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: