Relay: Improved the Finder 36.11 relays.

[mgottschlag]

• Added Finder 36.11-4001 SPDT relay.
• Changed footprint of Finder 36.11-4301 relay (was completely wrong).
• Fixed the datasheet of the 36.11-4001 relay (used to point to 4011
  datasheet).
• Fixed the properties of RM50-xx21.

Intended as a fix for #1275.

---

Thanks for creating a pull request to contribute to the KiCad libraries! To speed up integration of your PR, please check the following items:

• Provide a URL to a datasheet for the symbol(s) you are contributing
  https://www.finder-relais.net/en/finder-relays-series-36.pdf
• An example screenshot image is very helpful
  
  
• Ensure that the associated footprints match the official footprint library
  (they don't... see the footprint PR)
• If there are matching footprint PRs, provide link(s) as appropriate
  Relay: Added Finder 36.11 footprints (copied from Sanyou relays). kicad-footprints#1181
• Check the output of the Travis automated check scripts - fix any errors as required

[myfreescalewebpage]

Hi @mgottschlag , thanks for contributing,

A few comments I have during my review:

FINDER-32.21-x300

• Can you fix the travis error about pin name position offset at the same time (should be 20mil) ?

FINDER-36.11-4301

• Can you fix the travis error about pin name position offset (should be 20mil) ?
• RM50-xx21 has not exactly the same size, the footprint should be defined too and associated correclty.

FINDER-36.11-4001

• Can you fix the travis error about pin name position offset (should be 20mil) ?

Need to wait for the footprints to merge this PR.

Cheers,
Joel

[myfreescalewebpage]

@mgottschlag ping!

[chschlue]

@mgottschlag @myfreescalewebpage
Must have missed this when I opened #1998 and KiCad/kicad-footprints#1728

Also, -4001 is out of production.

[myfreescalewebpage]

Thanks for the answer. However, all FINDER-36.11 are not the same so #1998 seems invalid.... This PR seems better. But maybe I miss something ?

[chschlue]

I think there's just the double throw variant 36.11-4011 left.
Not sure about your policy regarding extinct parts.

KiCad/kicad-website#418 is still open anyway.

[evanshultz]

Merging this would likely break my PR at #1984. I would love if my PR could be merged and I'll incorporate changes here into my PR if that makes things easier.

I also reviewed the footprint mentioned above.

[myfreescalewebpage]

@evanshultz according to your previous comment I suggest we should reject this PR. What do you think ?

[evanshultz]

@myfreescalewebpage
I also see that -4301 was withdrawn from the market, but why does it need to be removed from the library? Are you saying to close this and continue on with #1998?

[myfreescalewebpage]

I also see that -4301 was withdrawn from the market, but why does it need to be removed from the library

I do not suggest to remove it from the library.

I just ask if this PR should be rejected if it breaks #1984 enhancements?

[evanshultz]

#1984 was already merged. And I didn't incorporate the changes here since I never got a response.

I don't see anything wrong with the concept of this PR, and while -4001 may be out of production surely there are compatible relays available on the market. These relay symbols are more complex than they need to be, but if they are updated to the style from #1984 I'm OK merging.

[myfreescalewebpage]

OK, just some few fix to do. @mgottschlag can you fix the issues in my previous comment (#1278 (comment)) ? Thanks.

[myfreescalewebpage]

No news of the original author, indicate the PR is abandoned.