The question of pre-training accuracy

[bunnyveil]

I first ran the classification task of ModelNet40 training-from-scratch in pointmamba on four 3080Ti, and selected the your pretrain.pth file to run the train from pre-trained classification of ModelNet40. All these are implemented in accordance with the parameters and steps described in the paper, but the final classification accuracy is only 93.0713%, while the best classification accuracy mentioned in the paper is 93.6%.We ran it many times(pic 1 with voting and pic 2,3,4 without voting) I have tested other classification and segmentation tasks, and the results obtained in accordance with the parameters in the paper have decreased by about 1-4 percentage points compared with those in the paper. I wonder if this is a problem or if the model parameters in the article are not updated in real time?

[LMD0311]

Thank you for your interest in our work!

The code currently open-sourced from the repository aligns with the paper's current version. Our models are all trained and tested using a single RTX 4090, which may differ across hardware platforms. Also please refer to this issue and the explanation here.

Feel free to evaluate our open-sourced weight for ModelNet40.

[formerlya]

May I ask if you can directly test with the weights you provide? The accuracy of the test in pointmamba is only 7%~8%, and the weight files provided by them are also used in point-MAE, with about 93.5%

[formerlya]

并且当我训练的时候

会nan
同样的数据，在mae中可以正常训练
请问可以直接使用代码中的超参数吗，需要针对性调整？

[LMD0311]

May I ask if you can directly test with the weights you provide? The accuracy of the test in pointmamba is only 7%~8%, and the weight files provided by them are also used in point-MAE, with about 93.5%

I just re-cloned the repository, downloaded the open-sourced checkpoint, and achieved the exact same results as reported. The test command should be CUDA_VISIBLE_DEVICES=0 python main.py --test --config cfgs/finetune_modelnet.yaml --ckpts modelnet_scratch.pth.

[LMD0311]

并且当我训练的时候 会nan 同样的数据，在mae中可以正常训练 请问可以直接使用代码中的超参数吗，需要针对性调整？

I'm sorry, we never encountered an issue with NaN.

[formerlya]

并且当我训练的时候 会nan 同样的数据，在mae中可以正常训练 请问可以直接使用代码中的超参数吗，需要针对性调整？

I'm sorry, we never encountered an issue with NaN.

Thank you very much for your answer~

[LMD0311]

I am closing this issue. Please feel free to reopen it if necessary.

[HerculesJL]

@formerlya Hello, may I ask how you solved NaN problem?