Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Eliminate requirement of sudo in l99 disk command #205

Open
bburns opened this issue Dec 16, 2022 · 0 comments
Open

Eliminate requirement of sudo in l99 disk command #205

bburns opened this issue Dec 16, 2022 · 0 comments
Assignees
@ottobolyos
Labels
application:cli Anything related to a specific application enhancement New feature or request infrastructure Anything related to the surrounding tools and infrastructure

Comments

@bburns
Copy link
Contributor

bburns commented Dec 16, 2022

yeah there's something in the docker setups that led to folders in the setup being owned by root, so need sudo to see disk space. maybe could work around. will add to list.
ob: IMO this needs to be investigated and fixed. I think I could help you if you give me some pointers where the problem lays. Or is the ownership changed by external tools (e.g. Docker)?
@tukusejssirs tukusejssirs added enhancement New feature or request infrastructure Anything related to the surrounding tools and infrastructure labels Dec 22, 2022
@tukusejssirs tukusejssirs changed the title l99 disk command - eliminate sudo Eliminate requirement of sudo in l99 disk command Dec 22, 2022
@bburns bburns added the application:cli Anything related to a specific application label Jan 24, 2023
@ottobolyos ottobolyos assigned ottobolyos and unassigned tukusejssirs Feb 8, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees

@ottobolyos ottobolyos

Labels
application:cli Anything related to a specific application enhancement New feature or request infrastructure Anything related to the surrounding tools and infrastructure
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
3 participants
@bburns @tukusejssirs @ottobolyos