-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 858
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
don't require SUPERUSER
to run migrations
#3002
Conversation
2c2413e
to
539cb9d
Compare
We normally use the system postgres, its unlikely that we would remember to test again for this rare problem with another postgres. I also dont want to pollute the repo root with more files. Its better if you can apply this init step to the postgres used by ci, which is defined at the bottom of |
539cb9d
to
ae52d28
Compare
77a7ae4
to
072e744
Compare
Last force pushes were to rebase onto |
e2761aa
to
a2a2fb9
Compare
Fixes #2863.
The first commit fixes the problem, the second one prevents it from happening again.
The second commit is there to convey the idea but obviously it shouldn't be implemented this way since there's an existing
docker-compose.yml
in the repository. If you can point me to the relevant places this sort of change needs to actually happen, I'll amend that second commit.Would probably also be wise to test this with more data, I used a completely different hack to work around this for my instance.