Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

values & principals #31

Open
dsernst opened this issue Jul 14, 2014 · 7 comments
Open

values & principals #31

dsernst opened this issue Jul 14, 2014 · 7 comments

Comments

@dsernst
Copy link
Member

dsernst commented Jul 14, 2014

What values does LetsFix embody and promote? What are our principals? At a risk of getting too lost on theory, and losing track of the practical, won't focus on this too much at this point in time. Leaving this as a placeholder to consolidate discussion around this topic.

@dsernst
Copy link
Member Author

dsernst commented Jul 14, 2014

@dsernst
Copy link
Member Author

dsernst commented Jul 17, 2014

some ideas:

  • open -- anyone & everyone is welcome. the more perspectives the better. "given enough eyeballs, all bugs are shallow"
  • voluntarily -- everything is opt-in. nothing is forced. anyone can walk away at any time
  • avoiding the ego -- this is about us, not you / me as individuals
  • empowered -- we feel capable to stand up, speak for ourselves, do things for ourselves. “The world needs people who see something that needs to be done and start to do it, without permission or advice. They just start doing it.”
  • long-term over short -- try to keep the long-term consequences in mind, and don't merely go for the quick band-aid fixes, kicking the can down the road for future-us to deal with

@iangilman
Copy link
Member

These are all great.

This may not be the right place to discuss this, but while we pursue openness, we still need to think about how to deal with disruptive influences. We should be open to people who are trying to help, but we also need a sturdy enough immune system to handle trolls, spammers, etc. One foundation for this is a principle of mutual respect.

@a1949seeker
Copy link

That's a bingo!

On Sun, Jul 20, 2014 at 4:43 PM, iangilman notifications@github.com wrote:

These are all great.

This may not be the right place to discuss this, but while we pursue
openness, we still need to think about how to deal with disruptive
influences. We should be open to people who are trying to help, but we also
need a sturdy enough immune system to handle trolls, spammers, etc. One
foundation for this is a principle of mutual respect.


Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
#31 (comment).

@dsernst
Copy link
Member Author

dsernst commented Jul 23, 2014

"Mutual respect". Great one! And good points about being responsive to disruptions.

Somewhat along the same lines, I've been thinking a lot about ideas related to freedom of speech. That doesn't quite sound right for a label, but I'm trying to get at an idea of freedom to contribute your personal view, even when it's not shared by the majority. "The right to communicate one's opinions and ideas... to anyone who is willing to hear them."

@iangilman
Copy link
Member

Many problems can be productively addressed in multitude of ways. Problem pages should seek to document all of these ways, rather than being a popularity contest for "the best way". That said, we can still sort by popularity, so if you don't know where to start, you don't have to sift through all the options. The other options will still be there, though, not suppressed, so people can find what they must resonate with.

With free speech there's always the tension between suppressing minority opinions and forcing people to hear something they don't want to. The answer, as always, is somewhere in the middle.

@dsernst
Copy link
Member Author

dsernst commented Jul 26, 2014

+1

On Saturday, July 26, 2014, iangilman notifications@github.com wrote:

Many problems can be productively addressed in multitude of ways. Problem
pages should seek to document all of these ways, rather than being a
popularity contest for "the best way". That said, we can still sort by
popularity, so if you don't know where to start, you don't have to sift
through all the options. The other options will still be there, though, not
suppressed, so people can find what they must resonate with.

With free speech there's always the tension between suppressing minority
opinions and forcing people to hear something they don't want to. The
answer, as always, is somewhere in the middle.


Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
#31 (comment).

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants