-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 8.5k
/
vir_con.cpp
158 lines (121 loc) · 4.05 KB
/
vir_con.cpp
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
/**
* @file vir_con.cpp
* @brief
* 构造函数不可以声明为虚函数。同时除了inline之外,构造函数不允许使用其它任何关键字。
*
* 为什么构造函数不可以为虚函数?
*
* 尽管虚函数表vtable是在编译阶段就已经建立的,但指向虚函数表的指针vptr是在运行阶段实例化对象时才产生的。
* 如果类含有虚函数,编译器会在构造函数中添加代码来创建vptr。
* 问题来了,如果构造函数是虚的,那么它需要vptr来访问vtable,可这个时候vptr还没产生。
* 因此,构造函数不可以为虚函数。
* 我们之所以使用虚函数,是因为需要在信息不全的情况下进行多态运行。而构造函数是用来初始化实例的,实例的类型必须是明确的。
* 因此,构造函数没有必要被声明为虚函数。
* 尽管构造函数不可以为虚函数,但是有些场景下我们确实需要 “Virtual Copy
* Constructor”。
* “虚复制构造函数”的说法并不严谨,其只是一个实现了对象复制的功能的类内函数。
* 举一个应用场景,比如剪切板功能。
* 复制内容作为基类,但派生类可能包含文字、图片、视频等等。
* 我们只有在程序运行的时候才知道我们需要复制的具体是什么类型的数据。
*
* @author 光城
* @version v1
* @date 2019-07-24
*/
#include <iostream>
using namespace std;
//// LIBRARY SRART
class Base {
public:
Base() {}
virtual // Ensures to invoke actual object destructor
~Base() {}
virtual void ChangeAttributes() = 0;
// The "Virtual Constructor"
static Base *Create(int id);
// The "Virtual Copy Constructor"
virtual Base *Clone() = 0;
};
class Derived1 : public Base {
public:
Derived1() { cout << "Derived1 created" << endl; }
Derived1(const Derived1 &rhs) {
cout << "Derived1 created by deep copy" << endl;
}
~Derived1() { cout << "~Derived1 destroyed" << endl; }
void ChangeAttributes() { cout << "Derived1 Attributes Changed" << endl; }
Base *Clone() { return new Derived1(*this); }
};
class Derived2 : public Base {
public:
Derived2() { cout << "Derived2 created" << endl; }
Derived2(const Derived2 &rhs) {
cout << "Derived2 created by deep copy" << endl;
}
~Derived2() { cout << "~Derived2 destroyed" << endl; }
void ChangeAttributes() { cout << "Derived2 Attributes Changed" << endl; }
Base *Clone() { return new Derived2(*this); }
};
class Derived3 : public Base {
public:
Derived3() { cout << "Derived3 created" << endl; }
Derived3(const Derived3 &rhs) {
cout << "Derived3 created by deep copy" << endl;
}
~Derived3() { cout << "~Derived3 destroyed" << endl; }
void ChangeAttributes() { cout << "Derived3 Attributes Changed" << endl; }
Base *Clone() { return new Derived3(*this); }
};
// We can also declare "Create" outside Base.
// But is more relevant to limit it's scope to Base
Base *Base::Create(int id) {
// Just expand the if-else ladder, if new Derived class is created
// User need not be recompiled to create newly added class objects
if (id == 1) {
return new Derived1;
} else if (id == 2) {
return new Derived2;
} else {
return new Derived3;
}
}
//// LIBRARY END
//// UTILITY SRART
class User {
public:
User() : pBase(0) {
// Creates any object of Base heirarchey at runtime
int input;
cout << "Enter ID (1, 2 or 3): ";
cin >> input;
while ((input != 1) && (input != 2) && (input != 3)) {
cout << "Enter ID (1, 2 or 3 only): ";
cin >> input;
}
// Create objects via the "Virtual Constructor"
pBase = Base::Create(input);
}
~User() {
if (pBase) {
delete pBase;
pBase = 0;
}
}
void Action() {
// Duplicate current object
Base *pNewBase = pBase->Clone();
// Change its attributes
pNewBase->ChangeAttributes();
// Dispose the created object
delete pNewBase;
}
private:
Base *pBase;
};
//// UTILITY END
//// Consumer of User (UTILITY) class
int main() {
User *user = new User();
user->Action();
delete user;
}