-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.1k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
New feature: Inline links - simpler syntax support #65
Comments
I would advocate something similar, but this will need additional features from Hoedown. I think they already have something going on (hoedown/hoedown#64), but nothing concrete yet. In any case, the method you mentioned feels a bit too subtile to my liking. Something like Automatic Cross-References might be better—you write # My heading {my-heading} in the header, and link to it like [My heading](#my-heading) A little more verbose, but less magic going on. I’ll leave this open as a reference/reminder. Will be on hold until the relevant feature is implemented in Hoedown. |
Thanks for your reply! Yes, this is certainly better. I hope Hoedown implements this feature soon. |
Would be a real great addition. |
Pandoc has this feature. Some consistency across the markdown world would be nice. :-) |
@Jmuccigr , I think this is why they invented CommonMark. I guess we all would like MacDown to support CommonMark. |
Yes, the developer of pandoc is on the common mark team as well. CommonMark isn't finalized yet either, so it's not so simple. |
I see... I wish they added:
|
I think the way inline links are currently implemented is way to difficult to write. I don't really want to use HTML for this purpose if there is another way. Maybe you can offer support for existing Markdown extensions that cover that functionality.
I am mainly familiar with MultiMarkdown and if you define in example a heading there like this:
You can just link to it using this:
I think that's way easier.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: