Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Set expected feature count in one place instead of 3 #4116

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Sep 1, 2015

Conversation

abonas
Copy link
Member

@abonas abonas commented Aug 31, 2015

Reduce manual work by setting feature count in one place instead of 3

@abonas
Copy link
Member Author

abonas commented Aug 31, 2015

cc @zeari @simon3z
@miq-bot add_label test
@miq-bot add_label enhancement

@abonas
Copy link
Member Author

abonas commented Aug 31, 2015

@Fryguy @blomquisg

@jrafanie
Copy link
Member

@abonas, I like it, maybe expected_feature_count as the variable name to make it clear it is the expected value.

@abonas
Copy link
Member Author

abonas commented Aug 31, 2015

@abonas, I like it, maybe expected_feature_count as the variable name to make it clear it is the expected value.

np, will rename

@miq-bot
Copy link
Member

miq-bot commented Aug 31, 2015

<pr_mergeability_checker />This pull request is not mergeable. Please rebase and repush.

@miq-bot
Copy link
Member

miq-bot commented Sep 1, 2015

Checked commit abonas@cc337da with rubocop 0.33.0 and haml-lint 0.13.0
1 file checked, 0 offenses detected
Everything looks good. 🍪

@abonas
Copy link
Member Author

abonas commented Sep 1, 2015

@jrafanie ready to merge?

@jrafanie
Copy link
Member

jrafanie commented Sep 1, 2015

🎉

jrafanie added a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 1, 2015
Set expected feature count in one place instead of 3
@jrafanie jrafanie merged commit 859c4cd into ManageIQ:master Sep 1, 2015
@jrafanie jrafanie added this to the Sprint 29 Ending Sept 14, 2015 milestone Sep 1, 2015
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants