Replaced the use of deprecated <big> tag #1799 #1802
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
jonahtanjz
approved these changes
Mar 6, 2022
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Thanks for contributing to MarkBind @NaincyKumariKnoldus!
Same comment as #1801 (comment), would be good to follow the PR template for the description :)
LGTM 👍
|
@all-contributors please add @NaincyKumariKnoldus for doc |
|
I've put up a pull request to add @NaincyKumariKnoldus! 🎉 |
Thanks @tlylt |
|
@NaincyKumariKnoldus already contributed before to doc |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Hey @tlylt I have updated the tag to ++Large++. Please Review my PR.
If still any changes needed do inform me.
Thanks!
Reviewer(tlylt) edits
Fixes #1799
Proposed commit message: (wrap lines at 72 characters)
Replace deprecated
<big>tag with ++ syntax