Class name already contained Controller

[vaibhavmule]

Don't need Controller in the doc strings as Class name already has controller in it

[coveralls]

Coverage remained the same at 91.699% when pulling e821f3e on vaibhavmule-patch-2 into 35f0cfd on develop.

[bjorntheart]

The class name does not necessarily have the word Controller in it. The reason being that you can pass [-e|--exact] to the controller generator command which generate a class name such as Something when you run the command craft controller -e Something. This produces the following code

class Something:

    def show(self):
        pass

When you omit the [-e|--exact] flag it produces the following code

class SomethingController:

    def show(self):
        pass

[josephmancuso]

@bjorntheart Very good point! My reasoning was that most of the time the user will not use the -e flag and it's just a docstring. People can modify it. But good point that the class won't necessarily always have the controller name in it.