Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Replace eth-query with ethjs-query? #731

Closed
mcmire opened this issue Mar 18, 2022 · 4 comments
Closed

Replace eth-query with ethjs-query? #731

mcmire opened this issue Mar 18, 2022 · 4 comments

Comments

@mcmire
Copy link
Contributor

mcmire commented Mar 18, 2022

These packages sound the same but they are different.

Related issue: #108

@mcmire mcmire changed the title Replace eth-query with ethjs-query Replace eth-query with ethjs-query? Mar 18, 2022
@legobeat
Copy link
Contributor

legobeat commented Dec 8, 2022

I guess this is not relevant anymore? #852

@mcmire
Copy link
Contributor Author

mcmire commented Dec 8, 2022

I agree that this issue and #852 are mutually exclusive. I made them both because I wasn't sure what our long-term strategy was at the time.

Now that some time has passed, it seems like this issue is definitely relevant: considering that you've recently forked all of the ethjs-* packages, it would seem that we at least want to keep using those packages, which would imply that we don't want to use the eth-* packages.

As for the issue you mentioned, however: is it irrelevant? Perhaps not everyone would agree with the conclusion I gave — there are arguments to be made for not using Ethers for everything — but I think everyone has admitted, or at least hinted, that we ought to use newer libraries, and it sounds like you agree. But perhaps that view has changed?

@MajorLift
Copy link
Contributor

MajorLift commented Feb 8, 2024

@mcmire
Copy link
Contributor Author

mcmire commented Feb 8, 2024

Ah, yes. The new technical proposals answer this question by suggesting that we merge these two libraries together. Closing this since we can discuss this further within that proposal.

@mcmire mcmire closed this as not planned Won't fix, can't repro, duplicate, stale Feb 8, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants