Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

LibRaw: include(SelectLibraryConfigurations) missing from findlibraw_debug_fix.patch #6715

Closed
mloskot opened this issue May 31, 2019 · 4 comments
Labels
category:port-bug The issue is with a library, which is something the port should already support

Comments

@mloskot
Copy link
Contributor

mloskot commented May 31, 2019

Original FindLibRaw.cmake from LibRaw-cmake project does not contain the line include(SelectLibraryConfigurations), but the current patch calls the macro:

+
+select_library_configurations(LibRaw)
+


The patch has been proposed to the upstram LibRaw/LibRaw-cmake#7

/cc @trylle

@JackBoosY JackBoosY added the category:port-bug The issue is with a library, which is something the port should already support label Jun 3, 2019
@trylle
Copy link
Contributor

trylle commented Jun 3, 2019

Hi, @mloskot. Am preparing a PR to fix this.

From a cursory check, it looks like some files in unrelated ports arrow/findzstd.patch and unicorn-lib/CMakeLists.txt are also missing this include, @JackBoosY.

@mloskot
Copy link
Contributor Author

mloskot commented Jun 3, 2019

@trylle I didn't check it all. I have got focused on preparing the patch for FindLibRaw.cmake to pushed it to the upstream. Once this succeeds, I was going to do the same with lcms2_debug_fix.patch. Then, move to reviewing the rest :)

@mloskot
Copy link
Contributor Author

mloskot commented Jun 6, 2019

PR ref #6742

@ras0219-msft
Copy link
Contributor

Should be fixed by #6742. Thanks!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
category:port-bug The issue is with a library, which is something the port should already support
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants