-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 38
Conversation
userscripts were crashing, i fixed it. (the old manager which is still used). also put electron version back to 9.4.4 because thats what idkr 1.2.2 had and it has better performance than electron 12 |
app/modules/userscript-manager/userscript-executors/old/old-script-executor.js
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
i reverted the clientUtil change but please check #36 (comment) for my new issue. now the pull request can be merged because it only has the electron version change |
any reason why this shouldn't be merged then? |
Ill merge once I'm home to test. |
Few more things before merging besides the change to the lock file: The only one breaking change between v9 and v12 that we should care would be the default value for My plan is to have master branch with the latest Electron version, and a separate branch with v9. I will create a branch and merge this PR to the new branch if its ok. |
Other than that, v9 seems to work just fine from my testing. |
Sounds good to me @Mixaz017 👍 |
as far as v9 will get all fixes and features from main branch, sounds good 👍 or just like enable contextIsolation lol, isn't it more secure? why would they enable it in v12 if it was a bad thing? |
Our code is already written assuming that |
okay so propt need to be rewritten right? where exactly is prompt used tho? i thought it was the import settings, but that is now a custom prompt in krunker, so just removing it should be fine? |
- yeeted menutimer | ||
|
||
should be up to date with mixaz's master | ||
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
These changes are pretty much unnecessary (or at least needs to be polished)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
sorry my bad i wasnt aware these go to this pull request, i kinda just made my own fork lol
|
||
#package lock, will be generated anyway on install | ||
package-lock.json |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Lock file should not be ignored
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
sory i wasn't aware my commits went to this pull, but like why should it not be ignored? it gets generated from npm anyway, so having it there has no effect
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
https://docs.npmjs.com/cli/v7/configuring-npm/package-lock-json
Maybe try searching before asking next time
since you guys said you'd make a branch with v9, i'll just close this pull |
No description provided.