Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Can FEMU simulate the difference in sequential and random read/write performance on SSD? #137

Open
Borelset opened this issue May 16, 2024 · 1 comment

Comments

@Borelset
Copy link

As the title, are the differences between sequential and random performance considered in the delay model?

@huaicheng
Copy link
Contributor

huaicheng commented May 25, 2024

The difference in seq/random write workloads mainly stems from FTL mgmt/GC efficiency, from this perspective, yes, FEMU can simulate the above scenario. It's better for you to compose some workloads and observe the performance difference directly on FEMU.

If you're talking about low-level NAND Flash commands optimized for handling adjacent seq/rand accesses, no, those are not modeled by in FEMU's NAND timing model.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants