Add option "Reset Application" to Moonshine's settings

[piotrzarzycki21]

In order to get back application to the state from the first clean installation we should add option "Reset Application" in the settings.

Reset:

• Once user choose option "Reset Application" we need to have clean information message what will happen
• Moonshine will be restarted

[rat-moonshine]

Some things yet to look into:

• Upon cleaning settings, bottom SDK notification yellow patch is not showing (display not updating)
• Needs to think about how to handle Template settings reset

[rat-moonshine]

• Upon resetting, bottom SDK notification strap now showing properly
• After resetting startup prompt sequences re-initiated - SDK, Java etc.

[rat-moonshine]

• In Windows, everything shall reset including saved SDK list
• In Mac, except the bundled SDKs (~/Downloads/MoonshineSDKs) all other SDK will be removed from the list
• Per existing logic in Mac, one SDK will always set to default if any bundled SDK is present - after Clear (Moonshine > Settings > Default SDK) or Reset (Moonshine > Settings > General) happen

[JoelProminic]

I ran some tests for resetting the template data.

I added a comment line to each of the file templates, and then reset the settings. My changes were cleared.

I added a new file template with "Create new". After I reset the settings, this was cleared. (NOTE: I could not change the new file name, and I'm not sure how this would integrate with the current UI anyway. We may need to revisit this feature at some point).

For the project templates, I added a comment to the main file for each of the projects. I verified that my changes were reverted after running "Reset Everything".

[rat-moonshine]

I could not change the new file name, and I'm not sure how this would integrate with the current UI anyway. We may need to revisit this feature at some point

I think we could have a new issue reported on this, as an enhancement.

[piotrzarzycki21]

@rat-moonshine can we raise the new issue for that one and close #27 ?

[rat-moonshine]

That is how we agreed in fact in our last discussion with Joel. So yes, we can proceed that way, @piotrzarzycki21 .

[piotrzarzycki21]

Issue mentioned by @JoelProminic has been extracted #62