Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Standardise the use of Active #8888

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
May 7, 2024

Conversation

BieleckiLtd
Copy link
Contributor

@BieleckiLtd BieleckiLtd commented May 5, 2024

MudBlazor currently uses the IsActive property. This PR aims to standardise the use of Active to align with other boolean properties in the library.

Description

If this PR is approved, the v7 migration guide must also be updated, as this makes a breaking change:

MudPageContentSection: replace IsActive with Active

Linked issues:
Negative property names should be discouraged #6131
v7.0.0 Migration Guide #8447

Standardise the use of IsEnabled and Enabled #8764
Standardise the use of ItemDisabled #8887
Standardise the use of Checked, CheckedChanged and Checkable #8825
Standardise the use of Visible #8832
Standardise the use of Selected and SelectedChanged #8886
Standardise the use of Expanded, Expandable, IsExpanded and IsExpandable #8718
Standardise the use of Active #8888
Standardise the use of Open and OpenChanged #8891
Standardise the use of Editable #8892
Standardise the use of Hidden and HiddenChanged #8952

How Has This Been Tested?

unit

Type of Changes

  • Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
  • New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
  • Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to not work as expected)
  • Documentation (fix or improvement to the website or code docs)

Checklist

  • The PR is submitted to the correct branch (dev).
  • My code follows the code style of this project.
  • I've added relevant tests.

Copy link

codecov bot commented May 5, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 90.19%. Comparing base (28bc599) to head (df4a0fd).
Report is 161 commits behind head on dev.

❗ Current head df4a0fd differs from pull request most recent head bc2d74d. Consider uploading reports for the commit bc2d74d to get more accurate results

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##              dev    #8888      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   89.82%   90.19%   +0.36%     
==========================================
  Files         412      423      +11     
  Lines       11878    12274     +396     
  Branches     2364     2407      +43     
==========================================
+ Hits        10670    11071     +401     
+ Misses        681      669      -12     
- Partials      527      534       +7     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@henon henon merged commit 5824428 into MudBlazor:dev May 7, 2024
2 checks passed
@henon
Copy link
Collaborator

henon commented May 7, 2024

Haha, this PR has the luckiest number. Thanks @BieleckiLtd

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
breaking change bug Something does not work as intended/expected
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

4 participants