Feature Request: an export to apca-w3 that doesn't require colorparsley #94
Labels
Code integration
Issues relating with either porting code to another language or integrating the code with existing l
enhancement
New feature or request
npm package
specific to the published js packages
Is this about a tool (you're an end user) or about a code library (you're a developer)?
Yes. I already have RGBA arrays for my colors, so I don't need colorparsley in the APCA algorithm, but the library forces me to bundle it in. Would love an alternative
calcAPCAFromRGBA
that does the same thing but doesn't call colorparsley, so that I can avoid bundling the library when I wouldn't actually use it.Does this relate to a problem with using a tool or implementing code? Or is this something that would help expand use and application?.
it would just reduce bundle size by a few kb.
How do you think it would be best implemented?
super easily, i can shoot out a PR.
Have you considered other alternatives?
I was thinking about packaging my own version of apca-w3 that has all the goodies I'd like (written in typescript, a somewhat simpler API, convenience helpers) but the license on this repo is confusing to a mere web developer like myself so I'm not sure what's OK and what isn't.
Additional context
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: