Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Discuss approach to branch strategy for this epic #390

Closed
heidimok opened this issue Aug 3, 2022 · 2 comments
Closed

Discuss approach to branch strategy for this epic #390

heidimok opened this issue Aug 3, 2022 · 2 comments
Labels

Comments

@heidimok
Copy link
Contributor

heidimok commented Aug 3, 2022

Context

This is part of EPIC: MI Workflow Redesign #270

While the MI Workflow Redesign is taken place, curators needs a place to manually try out changes partway through without disrupting the production or staging version of the MI.

Action

  • Talk to Carson about how to split work so that test server has the new implementation
  • Let the team know what the approach will be for sharing development progress
@heidimok
Copy link
Contributor Author

heidimok commented Aug 22, 2022

Suggested approach after talking with John and Ed Aug 22:

  • Could feature flag. Django feature flagging library or just setting a cookie if curator's want to test it out.
  • We would aim to close out each story one by one after it's tested.
  • We won't need a separate branch. Will continue pushing to dev. The further we diverge from dev, the longer it'll take to bring it back.
  • Will keep things less confusing for team and Carson as well.

@heidimok
Copy link
Contributor Author

Closing this as the final decision was made to use the dev environment as the sandbox environment for the new workflow.

http://admgdev.nasa-impact.net/

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant