You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Hello,
Due to some requests and feedbacks from users, I'd suggest creating a lightweight version of the Numerical Python Library (NPL) that only include the essential packages like NumPy, Pandas, Xarray, and others necessary for Earth Sciences analysis. However, @vanderwb and I think that the main challenge here would be deciding which packages are 'essential' for Earth Sciences analysis.
To address this, @vanderwb proposed discussing this idea in the Earth Sciences Data Science (ESDS) community. By seeking input from diverse experts, we can collectively identify the critical packages.
A lightweight NPL version would bring several benefits, including faster clone times, easier maintenance for user cloning the environment, reduced disk space usage, improved compatibility, and a simplified learning experience.
I believe this issue could be resolved through a community discussion, perhaps in the form of a poll from ESDS community or a consultation period where users can suggest and vote on the packages they use the most.
I am creating this issue to track all the resources and conversations on this topic only for our reference.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Here is an initial list of packages that I think are mostly widely used, but this should definitely be confirmed with the user community and modified accordingly:
If anyone is familiar with a similar environment (set of basic packages for Earth Sciences Analysis), please feel free to post it here so we can use it as a reference.
Hello,
Due to some requests and feedbacks from users, I'd suggest creating a lightweight version of the Numerical Python Library (NPL) that only include the essential packages like NumPy, Pandas, Xarray, and others necessary for Earth Sciences analysis. However, @vanderwb and I think that the main challenge here would be deciding which packages are 'essential' for Earth Sciences analysis.
To address this, @vanderwb proposed discussing this idea in the Earth Sciences Data Science (ESDS) community. By seeking input from diverse experts, we can collectively identify the critical packages.
A lightweight NPL version would bring several benefits, including faster clone times, easier maintenance for user cloning the environment, reduced disk space usage, improved compatibility, and a simplified learning experience.
I believe this issue could be resolved through a community discussion, perhaps in the form of a poll from ESDS community or a consultation period where users can suggest and vote on the packages they use the most.
I am creating this issue to track all the resources and conversations on this topic only for our reference.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: