You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
In addition to standard unit tests for functionality, we should set up testing which checks that images produced by routines with visual output are a precise match to a reference image known to be correct, for a wide coverage of applicable inputs.
In the codebase there are currently some limited tests of this description, which use ImageMagick to compare outputs with reference images. The coverage of these tests should be increased, but first I propose to change the means for image comparison.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
In addition to standard unit tests for functionality, we should set up testing which checks that images produced by routines with visual output are a precise match to a reference image known to be correct, for a wide coverage of applicable inputs.
In the codebase there are currently some limited tests of this description, which use ImageMagick to compare outputs with reference images. The coverage of these tests should be increased, but first I propose to change the means for image comparison.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: