Remove redundant qualifiers

[c0shea]

I inadvertently did a force push, which closed #2336 and I couldn't seem to get it back. This PR is a redo now that #2327 has been merged.

To continue on our previous discussion, I'll create a new PR for expression-bodied members once this one is merged to avoid more conflicts.

I personally love to use var for everything. I know some people hate it because they want to see the types explicitly spelled out, but to me that's too verbose. If I want to know the type, I can just hover over the variable ;) That said, I could go either way depending on your thoughts. I think it would make the most sense for complex expressions, e.g. LINQ and other nested generic types, but it would be fine to keep using string test = "123" instead of making that a var.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Merging #2342 into master will decrease coverage by <1%.
The diff coverage is 84%.

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master   #2342    +/-   ##
=======================================
- Coverage      82%     82%   -<1%     
=======================================
  Files         318     318            
  Lines       22771   22770     -1     
  Branches     2782    2782            
=======================================
- Hits        18668   18660     -8     
- Misses       3401    3409     +8     
+ Partials      702     701     -1

[c0shea]

@304NotModified Not sure why Travis is failing the build with The command "sudo apt-key adv --keyserver keyserver.ubuntu.com --recv-keys 3FA7E0328081BFF6A14DA29AA6A19B38D3D831EF" failed and exited with 2 during . after I resolved the latest conflicts. Thoughts?

[304NotModified]

@304NotModified Not sure why Travis is failing the build with The command "sudo apt-key adv --keyserver keyserver.ubuntu.com --recv-keys 3FA7E0328081BFF6A14DA29AA6A19B38D3D831EF" failed and exited with 2 during . after I resolved the latest conflicts. Thoughts?

Travis is buggy. Will retry (a few times).

[304NotModified]

worked after 1 retry :)

Double check, you used R# for this isn't?

[c0shea]

Yes, I used ReSharper for this. So nice to do it in s couple clicks for the solution.

[304NotModified]

thanks!!

[snakefoot]

Must admit I kind of liked the NLog-prefix for the NLog-namespace specifications. But the removal of explicit this is great.