You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I revisited the point raised by @alecandido in this comment and it seems that cargo xtask could be a good fit. To summarize it in one point: instead of running ./make-release.sh X.Y.Z we'd run cargo xtask make-release X.Y.Z. The advantages are that it would run everywhere, not only where we have a shell. Maybe even more importantly, cargo xtask would also give us the opportunity to install and post-process manpages, which is a bit of a sore point right now (they're installed into a temporary directory whenever someone reads them and then they're subsequently removed).
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I like a lot the idea of using Rust code itself, and together with xshell (by the same author) it seems a good fit.
However, thinking about stability and support, I wonder if it's better to favor a different task runner, i.e. cargo make, which seems much more popular...
(but it wouldn't solve the language controversy...)
I revisited the point raised by @alecandido in this comment and it seems that
cargo xtask
could be a good fit. To summarize it in one point: instead of running./make-release.sh X.Y.Z
we'd runcargo xtask make-release X.Y.Z
. The advantages are that it would run everywhere, not only where we have a shell. Maybe even more importantly,cargo xtask
would also give us the opportunity to install and post-process manpages, which is a bit of a sore point right now (they're installed into a temporary directory whenever someone reads them and then they're subsequently removed).The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: