You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Dear authors,
in your paper you report results for SMAP, MSL and SMD however the anomaly detection is done at the entity level. Could you explain how you obtained precision, recall and f1 score for the whole data sets from the anomaly predictions you had for each of the entities that composed the data sets?
Best
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Dear authors, is there any update for this? I would also like to know, especially for the SMD dataset, how the f1 score is combined from each machine-i-j into a single score? Is the simple average of f1 taken over all the datasets? Or do you use the total TP/TN/FP/FN to calculate?
Dear authors,
in your paper you report results for SMAP, MSL and SMD however the anomaly detection is done at the entity level. Could you explain how you obtained precision, recall and f1 score for the whole data sets from the anomaly predictions you had for each of the entities that composed the data sets?
Best
We use the total TP/TN/FP/FN to calculate the overall results for data sets
Dear authors,
in your paper you report results for SMAP, MSL and SMD however the anomaly detection is done at the entity level. Could you explain how you obtained precision, recall and f1 score for the whole data sets from the anomaly predictions you had for each of the entities that composed the data sets?
Best
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: