Commit
This commit does not belong to any branch on this repository, and may belong to a fork outside of the repository.
Revert "cc-wrapper, bintools-wrapper: simply symlink man and info out…
…puts" This reverts commit 02c09e0.
- Loading branch information
Showing
4 changed files
with
12 additions
and
11 deletions.
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
c981787
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Is there any particular reason this was reverted?
binutils
is missing manpages again.c981787
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Ugh. Yes at the very least this should have been amended to always use
propagated-user-env-package
as you yourself wanted, @edolstra.c981787
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
That was the next commit: fde7296
c981787
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Oh OK. I'm sorry. Still, @edolstra, if you had made a PR with both commits and then instantly merged it, it would be easier to see that is a two-commit "transaction" and the individual revert shouldn't be evaluated in isolation. We'd be having this conversation in that PR thread and not on this commit too.
@Profpatsch so it's still not working despite fde7296 ?
c981787
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
On a current master:
Does this mean
propagated-user-env-packages
needs to be picked up by tools?c981787
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@Profpatsch it works with
nix-env
it doesn't work withnix-shell -p stdenv.cc.man
. Only the symlink works with both.