Skip to content

Commit

Permalink
openssl_1_0_1: not maintained anymore, remove
Browse files Browse the repository at this point in the history 
Contrary to master, this isn't used in 16.09.
  • Loading branch information
@fpletz
fpletz committed Jan 26, 2017
1 parent ad34c19 commit d1715e2
Show file tree
Hide file tree
Showing 2 changed files with 0 additions and 6 deletions.
5 changes: 0 additions & 5 deletions pkgs/development/libraries/openssl/default.nix
View file
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -105,11 +105,6 @@ let

in {

openssl_1_0_1 = common {
version = "1.0.1u";
sha256 = "0fb7y9pwbd76pgzd7xzqfrzibmc0vf03sl07f34z5dhm2b5b84j3";
};

openssl_1_0_2 = common {
version = "1.0.2k";
sha256 = "1h6qi35w6hv6rd73p4cdgdzg732pdrfgpp37cgwz1v9a3z37ffbb";
Expand Down
1 change: 0 additions & 1 deletion pkgs/top-level/all-packages.nix
View file
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -9029,7 +9029,6 @@ in
onlyHeaders = true;
};
})
openssl_1_0_1
openssl_1_0_2
openssl_1_1_0;

Expand Down

2 comments on commit d1715e2

@edolstra
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

However, people using Nixpkgs 16.09 might use it. In general we should not remove packages from the stable branch.

@fpletz
Copy link
Member Author

@fpletz fpletz commented on d1715e2 Feb 2, 2017

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I disagree. This package has open vulnerabilities for which the OpenSSL project won't backport fixes anymore. As we won't do that either either and OpenSSL being critical piece of software, we should not provide it in stable distributions by default.

What about using the broken flag instead? We should document this.

Please sign in to comment.