Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Build failure: localstack 3.2.0 #306848

Closed
zaporter-work opened this issue Apr 25, 2024 · 2 comments · Fixed by #306878
Closed

Build failure: localstack 3.2.0 #306848

zaporter-work opened this issue Apr 25, 2024 · 2 comments · Fixed by #306878

Comments

@zaporter-work
Copy link

zaporter-work commented Apr 25, 2024

Steps To Reproduce

Steps to reproduce the behavior:

  1. build localstack (from unstable) (version 3.2.0)

description = "A fully functional local Cloud stack";

shell.nix:

{pkgs ? import <nixpkgs> {}}: let
  unstableTarball =
    fetchTarball
    https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/archive/nixos-unstable.tar.gz;
  pkgs = import <nixpkgs> {};
  unstable = import unstableTarball {};
in
  pkgs.mkShell {
    nativeBuildInputs = with pkgs; [
      unstable.localstack
    ];
  }

Build log

https://gist.github.com/zaporter-work/1b05228b0a3a0647fd04a24f4ae62ca6

Additional context

localstack 2.3.0 works and so does this pinned 3.0.0 version

Notify maintainers

@jonringer
@mweinelt (tagged because you bumped the version)

Metadata

(the channel is slightly messed up. I am using 23.11 but with flakes)

 - system: `"x86_64-linux"`
 - host os: `Linux 6.1.71, NixOS, 23.11 (Tapir), 23.11.20240110.3dc440f`
 - multi-user?: `yes`
 - sandbox: `yes`
 - version: `nix-env (Nix) 2.18.1`
 - channels(root): `"nixos-22.11"`
 - nixpkgs: `/etc/channels/nixpkgs`

Add a 👍 reaction to issues you find important.

@mweinelt
Copy link
Member

The new version requires too many dependencies to package up in a reasonable time frame and even includes circular ones.

#306878 contains a revert to 3.0.0 which builds for me and shows the usage. Can you take a look if that works for you?

@zaporter-work
Copy link
Author

Sorry for the delay! Yes, the revert works well for me! Thank you!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

2 participants