New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
pythonPackages.fonttools: 4.14.0 → 4.18.2 #103818
Conversation
5b25900
to
9115740
Compare
9115740
to
a3b22b1
Compare
a3b22b1
to
7c25e0c
Compare
@GrahamcOfBorg build python3Packages.nototools |
Is this a PR that should be made against |
7c25e0c
to
9077931
Compare
python packages are pretty "cheap" in general. so <500 rebuilds is usually good |
|
9077931
to
29190cc
Compare
29190cc
to
29822f7
Compare
@GrahamcOfBorg build python3Packages.nototools |
@ofborg build pythonPackages.fonttools |
@ofborg build python3Packages.fonttools |
Result of 26 packages marked as broken and skipped:
22 packages failed to build:
270 packages built:
|
Can reproduce all build failures on master as well, seem unrelated. Tested
|
Motivation for this change
Things done
sandbox
innix.conf
on non-NixOS linux)nix-shell -p nixpkgs-review --run "nixpkgs-review wip"
./result/bin/
)nix path-info -S
before and after)