New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
mdbook: 0.4.4 -> 0.4.5 #108483
mdbook: 0.4.4 -> 0.4.5 #108483
Conversation
/marvin opt-in |
Hi! I'm an experimental bot. My goal is to guide this PR through its stages, hopefully ending with a merge. You can read up on the usage here. |
Result of 8 packages built:
|
I'll check in a moment, but I'm not sure if this warrants the label pinging @Havvy |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Haven't tested all depending packages, but the package itself builds and works fine.
Reviewed points
- package name fits guidelines
- package version fits guidelines
- package build on x86_64-linux
- executables tested on x86_64-linux
Result of 8 packages built:
|
This is a semi-automatic executed nixpkgs-review which does not build all packages (e.g. lumo, tensorflow or pytorch) Result of 6 packages failed to build and are new build failures:
1 package built:
|
Motivation for this change
Not sure what the process is for security issues, but version 0.4.4 was affected by a security vulnerability.
The CVE for the vulnerability is CVE-2020-26297.
Things done
sandbox
innix.conf
on non-NixOS linux)nix-shell -p nixpkgs-review --run "nixpkgs-review wip"
./result/bin/
)nix path-info -S
before and after)