Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

zotero: 5.0.89 -> 5.0.95 #113964

Merged
merged 4 commits into from Feb 22, 2021
Merged

zotero: 5.0.89 -> 5.0.95 #113964

merged 4 commits into from Feb 22, 2021

Conversation

i077
Copy link
Contributor

@i077 i077 commented Feb 22, 2021

Motivation for this change
Things done
  • Tested using sandboxing (nix.useSandbox on NixOS, or option sandbox in nix.conf on non-NixOS linux)
  • Built on platform(s)
    • NixOS
    • macOS
    • other Linux distributions
  • Tested via one or more NixOS test(s) if existing and applicable for the change (look inside nixos/tests)
  • Tested compilation of all pkgs that depend on this change using nix-shell -p nixpkgs-review --run "nixpkgs-review wip"
  • Tested execution of all binary files (usually in ./result/bin/)
  • Determined the impact on package closure size (by running nix path-info -S before and after)
  • Ensured that relevant documentation is up to date
  • Fits CONTRIBUTING.md.

@r-rmcgibbo
Copy link

r-rmcgibbo commented Feb 22, 2021

Result of nixpkgs-review pr 113964 at 328019b run on x86_64-linux 1

1 package built:
4 suggestions:
  • warning: maintainers-missing

    Package does not have a maintainer. Consider adding yourself?

    Near pkgs/applications/office/zotero/default.nix:141:3:

        |
    141 |   meta = with lib; {
        |   ^
    
  • warning: missing-phase-hooks

    installPhase should probably contain runHook preInstall and runHook postInstall.

    Near pkgs/applications/office/zotero/default.nix:106:3:

        |
    106 |   installPhase =
        |   ^
    
  • warning: patch-phase

    patchPhase should not be overridden, use postPatch instead.

    Near pkgs/applications/office/zotero/default.nix:89:3:

       |
    89 |   patchPhase = ''
       |   ^
    
  • warning: unclear-gpl

    agpl3 is a deprecated license, check if project uses agpl3Plus or agpl3Only and change meta.license accordingly.

    Near pkgs/applications/office/zotero/default.nix:144:5:

        |
    144 |     license = licenses.agpl3;
        |     ^
    

Result of nixpkgs-review pr 113964 at 328019b run on aarch64-linux 1

1 package built:
4 suggestions:
  • warning: maintainers-missing

    Package does not have a maintainer. Consider adding yourself?

    Near pkgs/applications/office/zotero/default.nix:141:3:

        |
    141 |   meta = with lib; {
        |   ^
    
  • warning: missing-phase-hooks

    installPhase should probably contain runHook preInstall and runHook postInstall.

    Near pkgs/applications/office/zotero/default.nix:106:3:

        |
    106 |   installPhase =
        |   ^
    
  • warning: patch-phase

    patchPhase should not be overridden, use postPatch instead.

    Near pkgs/applications/office/zotero/default.nix:89:3:

       |
    89 |   patchPhase = ''
       |   ^
    
  • warning: unclear-gpl

    agpl3 is a deprecated license, check if project uses agpl3Plus or agpl3Only and change meta.license accordingly.

    Near pkgs/applications/office/zotero/default.nix:144:5:

        |
    144 |     license = licenses.agpl3;
        |     ^
    

@davidak
Copy link
Member

davidak commented Feb 22, 2021

@i077 can you have a look at the suggestions from @r-rmcgibbo comment?

Maybe add yourself as maintainer, since there is currently none.

@i077
Copy link
Contributor Author

i077 commented Feb 22, 2021

@davidak done, and bin/zotero still runs on my end.

@SuperSandro2000
Copy link
Member

This is a semi-automatic executed nixpkgs-review with nixpkgs-review-checks extension. It is checked by a human on a best effort basis and does not build all packages (e.g. lumo, tensorflow or pytorch).
If you have any questions or problems please reach out to SuperSandro2000 on IRC.

Result of nixpkgs-review pr 113964 run on x86_64-linux 1

1 package built:
  • zotero

The following issues got detected with the above build packages.
Please fix at least the ones listed with your changed packages:

zotero:

agpl3 is a deprecated license, check if project uses agpl3Plus or agpl3Only and change meta.license accordingly.

Near pkgs/applications/office/zotero/default.nix:144:5:

    |
144 |     license = licenses.agpl3;
    |     ^

See: https://github.com/jtojnar/nixpkgs-hammering/blob/master/explanations/unclear-gpl.md
patchPhase should not be overridden, use postPatch instead.

Near pkgs/applications/office/zotero/default.nix:89:3:

   |
89 |   patchPhase = ''
   |   ^

See: https://github.com/jtojnar/nixpkgs-hammering/blob/master/explanations/patch-phase.md
Package does not have a maintainer. Consider adding yourself?

Near pkgs/applications/office/zotero/default.nix:141:3:

    |
141 |   meta = with lib; {
    |   ^

See: https://github.com/jtojnar/nixpkgs-hammering/blob/master/explanations/maintainers-missing.md
installPhase should probably contain runHook preInstall and runHook postInstall.

Near pkgs/applications/office/zotero/default.nix:106:3:

    |
106 |   installPhase =
    |   ^

See: https://github.com/jtojnar/nixpkgs-hammering/blob/master/explanations/missing-phase-hooks.md

@davidak
Copy link
Member

davidak commented Feb 22, 2021

Result of nixpkgs-review pr 113964 1

1 package built:
  • zotero

@davidak
Copy link
Member

davidak commented Feb 22, 2021

Thanks @i077!

Could you squash the last commit from @SuperSandro2000 into your last one?

@i077
Copy link
Contributor Author

i077 commented Feb 22, 2021

Whoops, didn't catch that small mistake. Fixed up my last commit with Sandro's.

@SuperSandro2000 SuperSandro2000 merged commit 148eff9 into NixOS:master Feb 22, 2021
@i077 i077 deleted the zotero/5.0.95 branch February 22, 2021 18:10
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

4 participants