Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

treewide: remove stdenv where not needed #115075

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Mar 4, 2021
Merged

Conversation

siraben
Copy link
Member

@siraben siraben commented Mar 4, 2021

Motivation for this change

Analogous to #110687, but performed manually since there wasn't that many.

Things done
  • Tested using sandboxing (nix.useSandbox on NixOS, or option sandbox in nix.conf on non-NixOS linux)
  • Built on platform(s)
    • NixOS
    • macOS
    • other Linux distributions
  • Tested via one or more NixOS test(s) if existing and applicable for the change (look inside nixos/tests)
  • Tested compilation of all pkgs that depend on this change using nix-shell -p nixpkgs-review --run "nixpkgs-review wip"
  • Tested execution of all binary files (usually in ./result/bin/)
  • Determined the impact on package closure size (by running nix path-info -S before and after)
  • Ensured that relevant documentation is up to date
  • Fits CONTRIBUTING.md.

@siraben
Copy link
Member Author

siraben commented Mar 4, 2021

Result of nixpkgs-review pr 115075 run on x86_64-darwin 1

1 package built:
  • documentation-highlighter

@r-rmcgibbo
Copy link

Result of nixpkgs-review pr 115075 at 98f2699 run on x86_64-linux 1

1 package built:
  • documentation-highlighter

@prusnak prusnak removed their request for review March 4, 2021 13:30
@roberth roberth merged commit 89aa017 into NixOS:master Mar 4, 2021
@siraben siraben deleted the stdenv-cleanup branch March 4, 2021 14:51
@attila-lendvai attila-lendvai mentioned this pull request Mar 8, 2021
10 tasks
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants