New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
lmdb: 0.9.25 -> 0.9.28 #117016
lmdb: 0.9.25 -> 0.9.28 #117016
Conversation
Result of 62 packages marked as broken and skipped:
3 packages failed to build (new failures):46 packages skipped due to time constraints:
41 packages built successfully:
2 suggestions:
|
This is a semi-automatic executed nixpkgs-review with nixpkgs-review-checks extension. It is checked by a human on a best effort basis and does not build all packages (e.g. lumo, tensorflow or pytorch). Result of 52 packages marked as broken and skipped:
4 packages failed to build and already failed to build on hydra master:
2 packages failed to build and are new build failures:
81 packages built:
The following issues got detected with the above build packages.
appstream:
warning: maintainers-missing Near pkgs/development/libraries/appstream/default.nix:42:3:
See: https://github.com/jtojnar/nixpkgs-hammering/blob/master/explanations/maintainers-missing.md |
https://github.com/LMDB/lmdb/blob/LMDB_0.9.28/libraries/liblmdb/CHANGES
I think it's pretty safe (and seems to work for me), but let me open a PR for a few days.
Things done
sandbox
innix.conf
on non-NixOS linux)nix-shell -p nixpkgs-review --run "nixpkgs-review wip"
./result/bin/
)nix path-info -S
before and after)