Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

jdupes: 1.19.1 -> 1.19.2 #117572

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Mar 30, 2021
Merged

jdupes: 1.19.1 -> 1.19.2 #117572

merged 1 commit into from Mar 30, 2021

Conversation

r-ryantm
Copy link
Contributor

Automatic update generated by nixpkgs-update tools. This update was made based on information from https://repology.org/metapackage/jdupes/versions.

meta.description for jdupes is: "A powerful duplicate file finder and an enhanced fork of 'fdupes'"

meta.homepage for jdupes is: "https://github.com/jbruchon/jdupes"

meta.changelog for jdupes is: ""

Updates performed
  • Version update
To inspect upstream changes
Impact
Checks done (click to expand)
  • built on NixOS

  • The tests defined in passthru.tests, if any, passed

  • /nix/store/9lbl5y6n3jiwcbh5xk4v7i157p8xkcpz-jdupes-1.19.2/bin/jdupes passed the binary check.

  • 1 of 1 passed binary check by having a zero exit code.

  • 1 of 1 passed binary check by having the new version present in output.

  • found 1.19.2 with grep in /nix/store/9lbl5y6n3jiwcbh5xk4v7i157p8xkcpz-jdupes-1.19.2

  • found 1.19.2 in filename of file in /nix/store/9lbl5y6n3jiwcbh5xk4v7i157p8xkcpz-jdupes-1.19.2

  • directory tree listing: https://gist.github.com/115fa223e389da35f9c3eb426523254b

  • du listing: https://gist.github.com/06a846c77f0b268fd89122bf63924bd1


Rebuild report (if merged into master) (click to expand)
1 total rebuild path(s)

1 package rebuild(s)

1 x86_64-linux rebuild(s)
0 i686-linux rebuild(s)
0 x86_64-darwin rebuild(s)
0 aarch64-linux rebuild(s)


First fifty rebuilds by attrpath
jdupes
Instructions to test this update (click to expand)

Either download from Cachix:

nix-store -r /nix/store/9lbl5y6n3jiwcbh5xk4v7i157p8xkcpz-jdupes-1.19.2 \
  --option binary-caches 'https://cache.nixos.org/ https://nix-community.cachix.org/' \
  --option trusted-public-keys '
  nix-community.cachix.org-1:mB9FSh9qf2dCimDSUo8Zy7bkq5CX+/rkCWyvRCYg3Fs=
  cache.nixos.org-1:6NCHdD59X431o0gWypbMrAURkbJ16ZPMQFGspcDShjY=
  '

(The Cachix cache is only trusted for this store-path realization.)
For the Cachix download to work, your user must be in the trusted-users list or you can use sudo since root is effectively trusted.

Or, build yourself:

nix-build -A jdupes https://github.com/r-ryantm/nixpkgs/archive/59906d78bd589ed3cce1b2adf8594e104527a4fe.tar.gz

After you've downloaded or built it, look at the files and if there are any, run the binaries:

ls -la /nix/store/9lbl5y6n3jiwcbh5xk4v7i157p8xkcpz-jdupes-1.19.2
ls -la /nix/store/9lbl5y6n3jiwcbh5xk4v7i157p8xkcpz-jdupes-1.19.2/bin


Pre-merge build results

We have automatically built all packages that will get rebuilt due to
this change.

This gives evidence on whether the upgrade will break dependent packages.
Note sometimes packages show up as failed to build independent of the
change, simply because they are already broken on the target branch.

Result of nixpkgs-review run on x86_64-linux 1

1 package built:
  • jdupes

Maintainer pings

cc @romildo for testing.

@asdf8dfafjk
Copy link
Contributor

Did some testing. Seems fine.

Possible upstream issues:

  1. Dosen't handle unicode normalization. 示 (793a) ⽰ (2f70) should ideally be considered same (couldn't find a flag either).

@romildo
Copy link
Contributor

romildo commented Mar 26, 2021

I am not interested in maintaining this package anymore.
@asdf8dfafjk would you like to become a maintainer for it?

@asdf8dfafjk
Copy link
Contributor

@romildo sorry I will not be able to maintain this consistently (and thank you for maintaining the countless other packages ...)

@romildo romildo merged commit 5f4a67a into NixOS:master Mar 30, 2021
@r-ryantm r-ryantm deleted the auto-update/jdupes branch March 30, 2021 03:23
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants