Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

dico: 2.10 -> 2.11 #120978

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Apr 29, 2021
Merged

dico: 2.10 -> 2.11 #120978

merged 1 commit into from Apr 29, 2021

Conversation

r-ryantm
Copy link
Contributor

Automatic update generated by nixpkgs-update tools. This update was made based on information from https://repology.org/metapackage/dico/versions.

meta.description for dico is: "Flexible dictionary server and client implementing RFC 2229"

meta.homepage for dico is: "https://www.gnu.org/software/dico/"

meta.changelog for dico is: ""

Updates performed
  • Version update
To inspect upstream changes
Impact
Checks done (click to expand)
  • built on NixOS

  • The tests defined in passthru.tests, if any, passed

  • /nix/store/s3bwd0s3zya8qxp2pbgnm8qhsh58qsin-dico-2.11/bin/dicod passed the binary check.

  • /nix/store/s3bwd0s3zya8qxp2pbgnm8qhsh58qsin-dico-2.11/bin/dico passed the binary check.

  • 2 of 2 passed binary check by having a zero exit code.

  • 2 of 2 passed binary check by having the new version present in output.

  • found 2.11 with grep in /nix/store/s3bwd0s3zya8qxp2pbgnm8qhsh58qsin-dico-2.11

  • found 2.11 in filename of file in /nix/store/s3bwd0s3zya8qxp2pbgnm8qhsh58qsin-dico-2.11

  • directory tree listing: https://gist.github.com/4c4536847b2b549e96d00400e6fd1287

  • du listing: https://gist.github.com/c417ccadfe252401cb461144f8212d0b


Rebuild report (if merged into master) (click to expand)
3 total rebuild path(s)

1 package rebuild(s)

1 x86_64-linux rebuild(s)
1 i686-linux rebuild(s)
0 x86_64-darwin rebuild(s)
1 aarch64-linux rebuild(s)


First fifty rebuilds by attrpath
dico
Instructions to test this update (click to expand)

Either download from Cachix:

nix-store -r /nix/store/s3bwd0s3zya8qxp2pbgnm8qhsh58qsin-dico-2.11 \
  --option binary-caches 'https://cache.nixos.org/ https://nix-community.cachix.org/' \
  --option trusted-public-keys '
  nix-community.cachix.org-1:mB9FSh9qf2dCimDSUo8Zy7bkq5CX+/rkCWyvRCYg3Fs=
  cache.nixos.org-1:6NCHdD59X431o0gWypbMrAURkbJ16ZPMQFGspcDShjY=
  '

(The Cachix cache is only trusted for this store-path realization.)
For the Cachix download to work, your user must be in the trusted-users list or you can use sudo since root is effectively trusted.

Or, build yourself:

nix-build -A dico https://github.com/r-ryantm/nixpkgs/archive/a4173f355e5d26039b82d99f97f65471a26f88c7.tar.gz

After you've downloaded or built it, look at the files and if there are any, run the binaries:

ls -la /nix/store/s3bwd0s3zya8qxp2pbgnm8qhsh58qsin-dico-2.11
ls -la /nix/store/s3bwd0s3zya8qxp2pbgnm8qhsh58qsin-dico-2.11/bin


Pre-merge build results

We have automatically built all packages that will get rebuilt due to
this change.

This gives evidence on whether the upgrade will break dependent packages.
Note sometimes packages show up as failed to build independent of the
change, simply because they are already broken on the target branch.

Result of nixpkgs-review run on x86_64-linux 1

1 package built:
  • dico

Maintainer pings

cc @lovek323 for testing.

@r-rmcgibbo
Copy link

Result of nixpkgs-review pr 120978 at a4173f3 run on x86_64-linux 1

1 package built successfully:
  • dico
1 suggestion:
  • warning: build-tools-in-build-inputs

    libtool is a build tool so it likely goes to nativeBuildInputs, not buildInputs.

    Near pkgs/servers/dico/default.nix:15:3:

       |
    15 |   buildInputs =
       |   ^
    

@tomberek
Copy link
Contributor

Result of nixpkgs-review pr 120978 run on x86_64-linux 1

1 package built:
  • dico

@tomberek tomberek merged commit 1c65a50 into NixOS:master Apr 29, 2021
@r-ryantm r-ryantm deleted the auto-update/dico branch April 29, 2021 20:55
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants