Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

libvirt: 7.0.0 -> 7.3.0 #121965

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from
Closed

libvirt: 7.0.0 -> 7.3.0 #121965

wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

ryantm
Copy link
Member

@ryantm ryantm commented May 6, 2021

Motivation for this change

new stable verison

Things done
  • Tested using sandboxing (nix.useSandbox on NixOS, or option sandbox in nix.conf on non-NixOS linux)
  • Built on platform(s)
    • NixOS
    • macOS
    • other Linux distributions
  • Tested via one or more NixOS test(s) if existing and applicable for the change (look inside nixos/tests)
  • Tested compilation of all pkgs that depend on this change using nix-shell -p nixpkgs-review --run "nixpkgs-review wip"
  • Tested execution of all binary files (usually in ./result/bin/)
  • Determined the impact on package closure size (by running nix path-info -S before and after)
  • Ensured that relevant documentation is up to date
  • Fits CONTRIBUTING.md.

@r-rmcgibbo
Copy link

r-rmcgibbo commented May 7, 2021

Result of nixpkgs-review pr 121965 at bacc804 run on x86_64-linux 1

2 packages failed to build:
28 packages built successfully:
  • collectd
  • collectd-data
  • docker-machine-kvm
  • docker-machine-kvm2
  • gnome3.gnome-boxes
  • haskellPackages.libvirt-hs
  • libguestfs
  • libvirt
  • libvirt-glib
  • libvmi
  • minikube
  • minishift
  • perl530Packages.SysVirt
  • perl532Packages.SysVirt
  • python38Packages.guestfs
  • python38Packages.libvirt
  • python39Packages.guestfs
  • python39Packages.libvirt
  • rubyPackages.ruby-libvirt (rubyPackages_2_6.ruby-libvirt)
  • rubyPackages_2_7.ruby-libvirt
  • terraform-full
  • terraform-providers.libvirt
  • vagrant
  • virt-manager
  • virt-manager-qt
  • virt-top
  • virt-viewer
  • virtlyst
7 suggestions:
  • warning: build-tools-in-build-inputs

    util-linux is a build tool so it likely goes to nativeBuildInputs, not buildInputs.

    Near pkgs/development/libraries/libvirt/default.nix:63:3:

       |
    63 |   buildInputs = [
       |   ^
    
  • warning: meson-cmake

    Meson uses CMake as a fallback dependency resolution method and it likely is not necessary here. The message about cmake not being found is purely informational.

    Near pkgs/development/libraries/libvirt/default.nix:55:3:

       |
    55 |   nativeBuildInputs = [
       |   ^
    
  • warning: unused-argument

    Unused argument: fetchpatch.
    Near pkgs/development/libraries/libvirt/default.nix:2:32:

      |
    2 | , makeWrapper, autoreconfHook, fetchpatch
      |                                ^
    
  • warning: unclear-gpl

    lgpl2 is a deprecated license, please check if project uses lgpl2Plus or lgpl2Only and change meta.license accordingly.

    Near pkgs/development/python-modules/libvirt/default.nix:25:5:

       |
    25 |     license = licenses.lgpl2;
       |     ^
    
  • warning: build-tools-in-build-inputs

    pkg-config is a build tool so it likely goes to nativeBuildInputs, not buildInputs.

    Near pkgs/development/libraries/libvirt/default.nix:63:3:

       |
    63 |   buildInputs = [
       |   ^
    
  • warning: unused-argument

    Unused argument: autoreconfHook.
    Near pkgs/development/libraries/libvirt/default.nix:2:16:

      |
    2 | , makeWrapper, autoreconfHook, fetchpatch
      |                ^
    
  • warning: missing-patch-comment

    Please add a comment on the line above, explaining the purpose of this patch.
    Near pkgs/development/libraries/libvirt/default.nix:52:5:

       |
    52 |     ./0001-meson-patch-in-an-install-prefix-for-building-on-nix.patch
       |     ^
    

Note that build failures may predate this PR, and could be nondeterministic or hardware dependent.
Please exercise your independent judgement.


Result of nixpkgs-review pr 121965 at bacc804 run on aarch64-linux 1

1 package marked as broken and skipped:
  • libvmi
1 package failed to build:
24 packages built successfully:
  • collectd
  • collectd-data
  • docker-machine-kvm
  • docker-machine-kvm2
  • gnome3.gnome-boxes
  • haskellPackages.libvirt-hs
  • libguestfs
  • libvirt
  • libvirt-glib
  • minikube
  • minishift
  • perl530Packages.SysVirt
  • perl532Packages.SysVirt
  • python38Packages.guestfs
  • python38Packages.libvirt
  • python39Packages.guestfs
  • python39Packages.libvirt
  • terraform-full
  • terraform-providers.libvirt
  • vagrant
  • virt-manager
  • virt-manager-qt
  • virt-top
  • virt-viewer
1 suggestion:
  • warning: unclear-gpl

    lgpl2 is a deprecated license, please check if project uses lgpl2Plus or lgpl2Only and change meta.license accordingly.

    Near pkgs/development/python-modules/libvirt/default.nix:25:5:

       |
    25 |     license = licenses.lgpl2;
       |     ^
    

Note that build failures may predate this PR, and could be nondeterministic or hardware dependent.
Please exercise your independent judgement.

@ryantm ryantm marked this pull request as draft May 8, 2021 04:18
@ajs124
Copy link
Member

ajs124 commented May 13, 2021

Probably replaces #120819

@wedens wedens mentioned this pull request May 15, 2021
10 tasks
@wedens
Copy link

wedens commented May 15, 2021

@wedens
Copy link

wedens commented May 22, 2021

Is there any chance it will make it to 21.05?

@jonringer
Copy link
Contributor

Is there any chance it will make it to 21.05?

If it's ready to merge.

If it's a non-breaking change, it can always be backported as well.

@teto
Copy link
Member

teto commented May 27, 2021

that's because the nixops-libvirtd plugin uses poetry and the lockfile uses an outdated python-libvirtd bindings. I would like to resume my usage of nixops-libvirtd and can fix it + add a flake. I've contributed to it in the past as shown by the open PRs https://github.com/nix-community/nixops-libvirtd . I think the current maintainers dont necessarily have the time to deal with that so if possible I would like to request merging rights on that repo too.

@teto
Copy link
Member

teto commented Sep 13, 2021

closing since #130805 got merged.

@teto teto closed this Sep 13, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

7 participants