New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
docker: 20.10.6 -> 20.10.7 #125946
docker: 20.10.6 -> 20.10.7 #125946
Conversation
Result of 1 test built:
|
Result of 11 packages built successfully:
Result of 12 packages built successfully:
2 suggestions:
|
@periklis are you simply trying to opt-out from this PR (as well), or generally not interested in maintaining the Docker derivation? |
0317026
to
0b0af59
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Docker still works so 👍 from me :)
I don't have any comments on the nix
related changes, and see no reason to oppose enabling buildx support by default.
0b0af59
to
fc38ada
Compare
@periklis since you don't seem to have interest in reviewing this, would you like me to remove you from the maintainers list? |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Big 👍 on enabling buildx by default - I actually just ran into this again when doing a k8s docker build.
Also version diff lgtm
This pull request has been mentioned on NixOS Discourse. There might be relevant details there: |
Successfully created backport PR #131456 for |
Motivation for this change
Minor update for Docker. See Docker release notes
Also enables buildx support by default; That change is up to discussion - buildx is available on Docker Desktop (MacOS), Ubuntu and Arch Linux out of the box, but not on NixOS. I don't see a reason why it shouldn't be enabled here.
Things done
sandbox
innix.conf
on non-NixOS linux)nix-shell -p nixpkgs-review --run "nixpkgs-review wip"
./result/bin/
)