got: 0.64 -> 0.66

[heph2]

Motivation for this change

Update to 0.66

Things done

• Built on platform(s)
  • x86_64-linux
  • aarch64-linux
  • x86_64-darwin
  • aarch64-darwin
• For non-Linux: Is sandbox = true set in nix.conf? (See Nix manual)
• Tested, as applicable:
  • NixOS test(s) (look inside nixos/tests)
  • and/or package tests
  • or, for functions and "core" functionality, tests in lib/tests or pkgs/test
  • made sure NixOS tests are linked to the relevant packages
• Tested compilation of all packages that depend on this change using nix-shell -p nixpkgs-review --run "nixpkgs-review rev HEAD". Note: all changes have to be committed, also see nixpkgs-review usage
• Tested basic functionality of all binary files (usually in ./result/bin/)
• 22.05 Release Notes (or backporting 21.11 Release notes)
  • (Package updates) Added a release notes entry if the change is major or breaking
  • (Module updates) Added a release notes entry if the change is significant
  • (Module addition) Added a release notes entry if adding a new NixOS module
  • (Release notes changes) Ran nixos/doc/manual/md-to-db.sh to update generated release notes
• Fits CONTRIBUTING.md.

[ghost]

It seems like one of the dependencies (libmd) is not supported on x86_64-darwin, so maybe this package should change platforms to exclude x86_64-darwin? Can be a follow-up PR.

error: Package ‘libmd-1.0.4’ in /Users/gordias/Documents/Code/nixpkgs/pkgs/development/libraries/libmd/default.nix:18 is not supported on ‘x86_64-darwin’, refusing to evaluate.

Otherwise, LGTM (but was unable to build/test on my machine)

[wahjava]

Seems to build, and work fine. Thanks!

[heph2]

@NotGordias So should i make another PR that change the supported platforms?

[ghost]

@heph2 I don't have a strong preference and didn't want to block this PR. I think either way is fine!