coqPackages.trakt: init at 1.0, coqPackages.smtcoq: init at itp22

[siraben]

Motivation for this change

Things done

• Built on platform(s)
  • x86_64-linux
  • aarch64-linux
  • x86_64-darwin
  • aarch64-darwin
• For non-Linux: Is sandbox = true set in nix.conf? (See Nix manual)
• Tested, as applicable:
  • NixOS test(s) (look inside nixos/tests)
  • and/or package tests
  • or, for functions and "core" functionality, tests in lib/tests or pkgs/test
  • made sure NixOS tests are linked to the relevant packages
• Tested compilation of all packages that depend on this change using nix-shell -p nixpkgs-review --run "nixpkgs-review rev HEAD". Note: all changes have to be committed, also see nixpkgs-review usage
• Tested basic functionality of all binary files (usually in ./result/bin/)
• 22.05 Release Notes (or backporting 21.11 Release notes)
  • (Package updates) Added a release notes entry if the change is major or breaking
  • (Module updates) Added a release notes entry if the change is significant
  • (Module addition) Added a release notes entry if adding a new NixOS module
  • (Release notes changes) Ran nixos/doc/manual/md-to-db.sh to update generated release notes
• Fits CONTRIBUTING.md.

[siraben]

Result of nixpkgs-review pr 162265 run on aarch64-darwin 1

2 packages built:

• coqPackages.smtcoq
• coqPackages.trakt

[auroraanna]

Okay it doesn't work now. But I know why. I shouldn't have recommend the https:// protocol in this case because that repo is only available via git://. I didn't check that. Some I read that he git protocol is unsafe. Now I read up on git:// some more and the lack of authentication means that by default anyone can write to the repo. Fortunately the owners seem to have disabled that (I can't push to it) so it shouldn't be a problem. Sorry for the mess!

[siraben]

Result of nixpkgs-review pr 162265 run on aarch64-darwin 1

3 packages marked as broken and skipped:

• echidna
• maude
• tamarin-prover

1 package failed to build:

• ginac

4 packages built:

• cln
• coqPackages.smtcoq
• coqPackages.trakt
• cvc4

[CohenCyril]

nix-build -A cvc4
these derivations will be built:
  /nix/store/s12fa4gvhv4nkll56nmhjm2dbm5v03y8-cln-1.3.6.drv
  /nix/store/lg77x1k703m73xdizw40nblmgyny57ic-cvc4-1.8.drv
these paths will be fetched (82.92 MiB download, 199.37 MiB unpacked):
  /nix/store/7hl64m5n08z8hqclm2mvqj4ka4i32q47-gnome-vfs-2.24.4
  /nix/store/ahl8r4p0cnqwrqapp5546gd7idz4vrhg-openjdk-8u322-ga
  /nix/store/bdxvdpcn56qam3wv0pm1nb39747a7dli-openjdk-8u322-ga-jre
  /nix/store/ixsi2hwc2w5awxkhjxqk4fr5lfa725v2-antlr-3.4
copying path '/nix/store/7hl64m5n08z8hqclm2mvqj4ka4i32q47-gnome-vfs-2.24.4' from 'https://cache.nixos.org'...
building '/nix/store/s12fa4gvhv4nkll56nmhjm2dbm5v03y8-cln-1.3.6.drv'...
unpacking sources
unpacking source archive /nix/store/3jzdpn5lg48dkm6ci6zyg0s8vfkd5r3h-cln
source root is cln
patching sources
configuring
no configure script, doing nothing
building
no Makefile, doing nothing
installing
install flags: SHELL=/nix/store/30j23057fqnnc1p4jqmq73p0gxgn0frq-bash-5.1-p16/bin/bash install
make: *** No rule to make target 'install'.  Stop.
builder for '/nix/store/s12fa4gvhv4nkll56nmhjm2dbm5v03y8-cln-1.3.6.drv' failed with exit code 2
cannot build derivation '/nix/store/lg77x1k703m73xdizw40nblmgyny57ic-cvc4-1.8.drv': 1 dependencies couldn't be built
error: build of '/nix/store/lg77x1k703m73xdizw40nblmgyny57ic-cvc4-1.8.drv' failed

[siraben]

@CohenCyril what system does this build log correspond to?

[CohenCyril]

NixOS x86_64

[CohenCyril]

On the master branch of nixpkgs

[siraben]

For some reason my patch works on darwin but causes linux to fail. Build error on darwin with the previous definition of cln: http://ix.io/3VeA

[hqurve]

After a bit of testing, it appears as if fetchGit is not working correctly with this site. By inspecting the src by running nix build .#cln.src, the directory structure is much more similar to the master branch than it is to the 1.3.6 release. Notice that the CMakeList.txt file is not present on 1.3.6.

I also tried supplying the commit hash, but to no avail

[gebner]

I'm really surprised that ofborg didn't fail CI here even though cln failed to build: https://logs.nix.ci/?key=nixos/nixpkgs.162265&attempt_id=b7315ae6-ac87-448d-a6b4-4bfc712ab818

error: build of '/nix/store/dqninbrx9wp5rln6amikn5w76xxr1lkl-coq8.13-smtcoq-itp22.drv', '/nix/store/s12fa4gvhv4nkll56nmhjm2dbm5v03y8-cln-1.3.6.drv' failed

[CohenCyril]

@siraben I didn't manage to compile smtcoq for coq 8.14 and 8.15 and is documented as such in the release .opam file. Did you ever test it for Coq 8.14 and 8.15?