ssm-session-manager-plugin: add "aarch64-linux" support

[WhyNotHugo]

Description of changes

This package has an if that covers only linux on amd64 and mac on all platforms. This adds support for linux of arm64.

Things done

• Built on platform(s)
  • x86_64-linux
  • aarch64-linux
  • x86_64-darwin
  • aarch64-darwin
• For non-Linux: Is sandbox = true set in nix.conf? (See Nix manual)
• Tested, as applicable:
  • NixOS test(s) (look inside nixos/tests)
  • and/or package tests
  • or, for functions and "core" functionality, tests in lib/tests or pkgs/test
  • made sure NixOS tests are linked to the relevant packages
• Tested compilation of all packages that depend on this change using nix-shell -p nixpkgs-review --run "nixpkgs-review rev HEAD". Note: all changes have to be committed, also see nixpkgs-review usage I am not using nixOS, so cannot run this.
• Tested basic functionality of all binary files (usually in ./result/bin/)
• 22.11 Release Notes (or backporting 22.05 Release notes)
  • (Package updates) Added a release notes entry if the change is major or breaking
  • (Module updates) Added a release notes entry if the change is significant
  • (Module addition) Added a release notes entry if adding a new NixOS module
  • (Release notes changes) Ran nixos/doc/manual/md-to-db.sh to update generated release notes
• Fits CONTRIBUTING.md.

I created a flake that includes this package and it build and worked fine.

CC: @mbaillie

[WhyNotHugo]

@martinbaillie I think you are the correct maintainer and the file has the wrong username?

[WhyNotHugo]

@maxeaubrey Maybe you're the right person to ping? :)

[amaxine]

@WhyNotHugo looks good but I don't have an arm64 nix box to verify. I'm also not sure of the "correctness" of the way the different archs are gated (just visually comparing with other derivations in nixpkgs, not that there's not 50 different approaches 😅) - I'd suggest posting in the "PRs ready for review" thread.

[WhyNotHugo]

This one? Done.

[nixos-discourse]

This pull request has been mentioned on NixOS Discourse. There might be relevant details there:

https://discourse.nixos.org/t/prs-ready-for-review/3032/1053

[WhyNotHugo]

CI seems happy now. I've tested building on aarch64 and amd64.

[SuperSandro2000]

@ofborg build ssm-session-manager-plugin

[SuperSandro2000]

Can you please fix the commit message to fit the contributing guide? Then ofborg would also be auto triggered.

After that we can merge this.

[WhyNotHugo]

Can you please fix the commit message to fit the contributing guide?

https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#writing-good-commit-messages

I don't see any specific convention mentioned. History makes it obvious what I should use, but perhaps an explicit mention in the docs would help? I'm very sure my previous contributions don't fit this very clear convention.

[WhyNotHugo]

I think ofborg is happy now.

[SuperSandro2000]

First bullet in https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#submitting-changes

[WhyNotHugo]

Thanks!

[WhyNotHugo]

Thanks!