tracker: 1.8.0 -> 1.10.1 (16.09)

[DamienCassou]

Motivation for this change

Contribute to #19678.

Things done

• Tested using sandboxing
  (nix.useSandbox on NixOS,
  or option build-use-sandbox in nix.conf
  on non-NixOS)
• Built on platform(s)
  • NixOS
  • OS X
  • Linux
• Tested compilation of all pkgs that depend on this change using nix-shell -p nox --run "nox-review wip"
• Tested execution of all binary files (usually in ./result/bin/)
• Fits CONTRIBUTING.md.

---

[grahamc]

@DamienCassou should this be applied to master as well?

[DamienCassou]

I agree with you @lethalman, this PR was not necessarily a good idea. I did that while doing other stuff and didn't think too much about it. I just answered to #19678. I didn't even test the binary (as you can see in the checkboxes).

What do we do now?

[grahamc]

Hey, yeah, we should revert this. I was looking again and think I misinterpreted the bug report. I've verified it hasn't been released to users yet, so I think reverting is A-OK.

[lucabrunox]

No problem. Revert :)

On Thursday 20 October 2016, Damien Cassou notifications@github.com wrote:

I agree with you @lethalman https://github.com/lethalman, this PR was
not necessarily a good idea. I did that while doing other stuff and didn't
think too much about it. I just answered to #19678
#19678. I didn't even test the
binary (as you can see in the checkboxes).

What do we do now?

—
You are receiving this because you were mentioned.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
#19702 (comment), or mute
the thread
https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAdWmKZ7575jhu59geXknj3sFJbPMhHiks5q1xTKgaJpZM4KbXfJ
.

NixOS Linux http://nixos.org